{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/alliance-research-review-register.schema.json",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/alliance-research-review-register.json",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.14-wip",
  "status": "work-in-progress",
  "report_count": 6,
  "disposition_count": 36,
  "truth_boundary": "This register records repository publication decisions for six supplied reports. It does not certify every archival claim, provide current geopolitical intelligence, or authorize actionable recruitment, influence, covert support, attack, evasion, or targeting guidance.",
  "reports": [
    {
      "report_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01",
      "title": "Global Alliance and Alignment Atlas: Who Aligns With Whom",
      "source_file": "docs/source-files/alliance-and-faction-systems-research/Global Geopolitical Alignment Map.md",
      "source_sha256": "5f44347f5745e8670f8769df4a9ba822fcf2b64544cc5f562d900d5815e01faf",
      "canonical_report": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/global-alliance-and-alignment-atlas.md",
      "canonical_route": "/docs/report/global-alliance-and-alignment-atlas",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "truth_boundary": "Current guidance is limited to the Reviewed Synthesis. The preserved source body is archival and real-world claims require current authoritative verification.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01-01",
          "topic": "relationship taxonomy",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Retain the twenty-category relationship vocabulary as a descriptive ontology; one pair of actors may hold several categories in different domains.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01-02",
          "topic": "current geopolitical map",
          "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not publish the source's current actor alignments or membership claims without checking dated official and authoritative evidence.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01-03",
          "topic": "country coverage",
          "disposition": "bounded",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Treat all-country coverage as a research roadmap and fairness commitment, not proof of equal research depth.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01-04",
          "topic": "hedging and neutrality",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Model hedging, nonalignment, neutrality, and strategic ambiguity as active choices with costs and benefits.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01-05",
          "topic": "moral classification",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Reject good-versus-evil bloc classification and permanent national or cultural alignment traits.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-01-06",
          "topic": "player information",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Show evidence, confidence, last verification, disagreement, and uncertainty rather than an omniscient truth screen.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02",
      "title": "How Alliances Actually Work: Formation, Maintenance, Burden Sharing, Disagreement, and Fracture",
      "source_file": "docs/source-files/alliance-and-faction-systems-research/Alliance Mechanics and Lifecycle.md",
      "source_sha256": "2a3b014c48bed79d942e42f3e4faaabbe427fe503fbd30272dc5cd355ddd7df7",
      "canonical_report": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/how-alliances-actually-work.md",
      "canonical_route": "/docs/report/how-alliances-actually-work",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "truth_boundary": "Current guidance is limited to the Reviewed Synthesis. The preserved source body is archival and real-world claims require current authoritative verification.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02-01",
          "topic": "alliance lifecycle",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Retain contact through stress-and-adaptation as a reversible lifecycle rather than a mandatory progression.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02-02",
          "topic": "burden sharing",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Represent financial, political, logistical, intelligence, technology, and domestic burdens separately.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02-03",
          "topic": "automatic obligation",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not imply that a treaty clause automatically produces one military or political response without interpretation and consent.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02-04",
          "topic": "case studies",
          "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Re-check current memberships, participation, treaty status, and practical cooperation before using real cases as present fact.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02-05",
          "topic": "power asymmetry",
          "disposition": "bounded",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Model unequal power without erasing smaller-member agency, vetoes, domestic politics, or specialized value.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-02-06",
          "topic": "counterintelligence",
          "disposition": "safety-restricted",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Keep partner-security analysis institutional and defensive; do not publish methods for penetrating or compromising alliances.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03",
      "title": "Informal Alignments, Patrons, Proxies, Intermediaries, and Issue-Specific Coalitions",
      "source_file": "docs/source-files/alliance-and-faction-systems-research/Informal Global Alignments Research.md",
      "source_sha256": "88564158dda6eb48e12adc12e4b6e7cf9d7be9a609c80130b356900b04e25d55",
      "canonical_report": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/informal-alignments-patrons-proxies-intermediaries-and-issue-specific-coalitions.md",
      "canonical_route": "/docs/report/informal-alignments-patrons-proxies-intermediaries-and-issue-specific-coalitions",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "truth_boundary": "Current guidance is limited to the Reviewed Synthesis. The preserved source body is archival and real-world claims require current authoritative verification.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03-01",
          "topic": "proxy terminology",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Use proxy only when public evidence supports direction, dependency, or meaningful operational influence.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03-02",
          "topic": "shared goals",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not infer partnership or proxy control solely from common adversaries, similar rhetoric, voting, or parallel action.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03-03",
          "topic": "local agency",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Preserve the autonomy, incentives, and domestic context of local actors even in asymmetric relationships.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03-04",
          "topic": "real cases",
          "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Treat every named contemporary case as time-sensitive and contested until checked against current evidence.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03-05",
          "topic": "confidence scale",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Use confirmed, high, moderate, low, disputed, and not-established states with an explicit evidentiary basis.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-03-06",
          "topic": "operational detail",
          "disposition": "safety-restricted",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not convert strategic descriptions into guidance for covert funding, sanctions evasion, clandestine communication, weapons transfer, or concealment.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04",
      "title": "Faction Archetypes and Recruitment Ecosystems: How Different Organizations Attract, Screen, Integrate, and Retain Members",
      "source_file": "docs/source-files/alliance-and-faction-systems-research/Faction Recruitment Mechanics Analysis.md",
      "source_sha256": "58a5614e765c6862b5c8c4fd7e64cacb6f980e1ec122b08cf897b867f9e505f0",
      "canonical_report": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/faction-archetypes-and-recruitment-ecosystems.md",
      "canonical_route": "/docs/report/faction-archetypes-and-recruitment-ecosystems",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "truth_boundary": "Current guidance is limited to the Reviewed Synthesis. The preserved source body is archival and real-world claims require current authoritative verification.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04-01",
          "topic": "archetype taxonomy",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Use twenty organizational archetypes as comparative lenses, not moral or legal equivalence classes.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04-02",
          "topic": "recruitability",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not infer recruitability, loyalty, or danger from diagnosis, disability, race, religion, nationality, gender, age, or migration status.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04-03",
          "topic": "recruitment mechanics",
          "disposition": "safety-restricted",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Limit public content to organizational pathways and safeguards; omit persuasion scripts, targeting criteria, coercion, blackmail, and clandestine contact methods.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04-04",
          "topic": "independent actors",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Give each faction an explicit independent-actor policy rather than assuming every organization welcomes lone volunteers.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04-05",
          "topic": "real organizations",
          "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Re-check real institutional rules and recruitment claims before any factual reuse.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-04-06",
          "topic": "exit and reintegration",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Model voluntary exit, burnout, disengagement, accountability, and reintegration as normal lifecycle states.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05",
      "title": "Lone-Actor Mobilization, Network Influence, and Disengagement Across Faction Types",
      "source_file": "docs/source-files/alliance-and-faction-systems-research/Lone-Actor Network Influence Research.md",
      "source_sha256": "2a28f6f468701f7518d2b02c845f527bb452370bca4b79333285125e2aa7919c",
      "canonical_report": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/lone-actor-mobilization-network-influence-and-disengagement.md",
      "canonical_route": "/docs/report/lone-actor-mobilization-network-influence-and-disengagement",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "truth_boundary": "Current guidance is limited to the Reviewed Synthesis. The preserved source body is archival and real-world claims require current authoritative verification.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05-01",
          "topic": "lone-actor label",
          "disposition": "bounded",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Treat lone actor as an operational relationship description, not proof of social isolation, ideology, diagnosis, or motive.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05-02",
          "topic": "influence continuum",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Keep exposure, peer reinforcement, contact, support, direction, membership, claim, disavowal, and disputed attribution distinct.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05-03",
          "topic": "mental health",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not use mental-health diagnosis or distress as a proxy for violent intent, capability, or faction alignment.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05-04",
          "topic": "prevention",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Emphasize trusted relationships, routine, support, off-ramps, disengagement, reintegration, and civil-liberties safeguards.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05-05",
          "topic": "causal statistics",
          "disposition": "requires-current-verification",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not reuse prevalence, causality, or faction-specific claims without current peer-reviewed or authoritative review.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-05-06",
          "topic": "tactical content",
          "disposition": "safety-restricted",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Omit attack methods, target selection, weapons, evasion, clandestine contact, and propaganda templates.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "report_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06",
      "title": "Alliance and Recruitment Worldbuilding System for an International Intelligence Role-Playing Game",
      "source_file": "docs/source-files/alliance-and-faction-systems-research/Fictional RPG Geopolitics System.md",
      "source_sha256": "1937b12a621fae06a536b05382594bb048e3cd184e9e9e090955e96b43cb4193",
      "canonical_report": "docs/long-term-memory/reports/alliance-and-recruitment-worldbuilding-system.md",
      "canonical_route": "/docs/report/alliance-and-recruitment-worldbuilding-system",
      "review_status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
      "truth_boundary": "Current guidance is limited to the Reviewed Synthesis. The preserved source body is archival and real-world claims require current authoritative verification.",
      "claims": [
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06-01",
          "topic": "fictional factions",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Use twelve fictional institutional archetypes as a starting set, revised to avoid direct copies and regional stereotypes.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06-02",
          "topic": "relationship model",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Track domain-specific relationship state, trust, obligation, interoperability, uncertainty, and public-versus-practical behavior.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06-03",
          "topic": "omniscient map",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not expose perfect global truth; reveal claims, evidence, confidence, disagreement, and correction through play and public records.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06-04",
          "topic": "unsafe mission seeds",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Remove document forgery, sabotage, covert intrusion, identity erasure, and other actionable mission instructions from public implementation.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06-05",
          "topic": "faction stereotyping",
          "disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Do not tie moral character, violence, deception, or competence to a real region, language, nationality, ethnicity, or religion.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        },
        {
          "claim_id": "AFR-OPS2-214-06-06",
          "topic": "interactive system",
          "disposition": "retained-design-guidance",
          "current_bounded_statement": "Implement a local, deterministic network explorer and faction blueprint as a reference prototype rather than a live MMO claim.",
          "review_basis": "Repository editorial, safety, provenance, and international-fairness review; current external facts remain subject to fresh authoritative verification."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}