{
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.4-wip",
  "generated_utc": "2026-07-20T12:04:07Z",
  "authorities": [
    {
      "code": "CIV-01",
      "slug": "port-meridian-civic-continuity-office",
      "name": "Port Meridian Civic Continuity Office",
      "organizational_type": "Civil administration",
      "customer": "Metropolitan continuity council",
      "mandate": "Maintain essential services and provide decision warning about infrastructure disruption.",
      "jurisdiction": "Port Meridian civil systems and contracted utilities",
      "motivations": [
        "Service continuity",
        "Public confidence",
        "Budget accountability",
        "Avoidance of cascading infrastructure failure"
      ],
      "intelligence_priorities": [
        "Supply interruption",
        "Insider misuse",
        "Foreign leverage over utilities",
        "Disinformation affecting emergency response"
      ],
      "collection_preferences": [
        "Auditable records",
        "Liaison reporting",
        "Technical monitoring",
        "Public-source verification"
      ],
      "constraints": [
        "Public-record obligations",
        "Privacy rules",
        "Local warrant thresholds",
        "Limited covert authority"
      ],
      "blind_spots": [
        "Slow cross-border access",
        "Political pressure during service failures"
      ],
      "resource_profile": "Strong local records and infrastructure access; limited external reach.",
      "operational_style": "Procedural, evidence-heavy, and continuity focused.",
      "typical_mission_types": [
        "Port-access anomaly investigation",
        "Critical-service sabotage review"
      ],
      "conflicts": [
        "Commercial confidentiality",
        "Military urgency",
        "Independent disclosure demands"
      ]
    },
    {
      "code": "MIL-07",
      "slug": "meridian-joint-defense-assessment-cell",
      "name": "Meridian Joint Defense Assessment Cell",
      "organizational_type": "Military command",
      "customer": "Joint operations commander",
      "mandate": "Provide warning, capability assessment, and force-protection intelligence for deployed formations.",
      "jurisdiction": "Declared defense facilities, deployed units, and alliance tasking areas",
      "motivations": [
        "Force protection",
        "Operational tempo",
        "Alliance assurance",
        "Prevention of strategic surprise"
      ],
      "intelligence_priorities": [
        "Order of battle",
        "Logistics vulnerability",
        "Command intent",
        "Technical capability"
      ],
      "collection_preferences": [
        "Technical collection",
        "Imagery",
        "Liaison reporting",
        "Field reconnaissance"
      ],
      "constraints": [
        "Rules of engagement",
        "Classification",
        "Partner releasability",
        "Command timelines"
      ],
      "blind_spots": [
        "Civilian political effects",
        "Commercial incentives outside the battlespace"
      ],
      "resource_profile": "Strong technical collection and transport; narrow customer deadlines.",
      "operational_style": "Time-sensitive, compartmented, and risk tolerant.",
      "typical_mission_types": [
        "Cross-border ceasefire verification",
        "Deployed-network compromise review"
      ],
      "conflicts": [
        "Civil due process",
        "Scientific openness",
        "Commercial continuity"
      ]
    },
    {
      "code": "COM-12",
      "slug": "halcyon-commercial-intelligence-office",
      "name": "Halcyon Commercial Intelligence Office",
      "organizational_type": "Commercial intelligence service",
      "customer": "Board risk committee and operating divisions",
      "mandate": "Protect research provenance, market access, personnel, and supply-chain continuity.",
      "jurisdiction": "Corporate facilities, contracts, and partner-access agreements",
      "motivations": [
        "Revenue continuity",
        "Intellectual-property protection",
        "Investor confidence",
        "Contract performance"
      ],
      "intelligence_priorities": [
        "Research theft",
        "Supplier coercion",
        "Regulatory exposure",
        "Competitor capability"
      ],
      "collection_preferences": [
        "Contract records",
        "Source networks",
        "Market analysis",
        "Technical audit"
      ],
      "constraints": [
        "Contract scope",
        "Civil law",
        "Brand risk",
        "Shareholder oversight"
      ],
      "blind_spots": [
        "Public-interest harms not tied to enterprise risk",
        "Overconfidence in proprietary records"
      ],
      "resource_profile": "Strong financial and corporate access; contested legitimacy outside owned systems.",
      "operational_style": "Discreet, metrics driven, and access oriented.",
      "typical_mission_types": [
        "Corporate research-provenance dispute",
        "Supply-chain manipulation review"
      ],
      "conflicts": [
        "Public disclosure",
        "State secrecy",
        "Independent-source protection"
      ]
    },
    {
      "code": "INT-03",
      "slug": "armistice-verification-secretariat",
      "name": "Armistice Verification Secretariat",
      "organizational_type": "International verification body",
      "customer": "Multilateral ceasefire commission",
      "mandate": "Verify compliance claims and provide shared findings acceptable to multiple signatories.",
      "jurisdiction": "Inspection corridors, monitoring sites, and agreed data exchanges",
      "motivations": [
        "Prevent escalation",
        "Maintain shared facts",
        "Protect inspector access",
        "Preserve signatory confidence"
      ],
      "intelligence_priorities": [
        "Ceasefire violations",
        "Sensor manipulation",
        "Restricted movement",
        "False attribution"
      ],
      "collection_preferences": [
        "Multi-party observation",
        "Chain-of-custody evidence",
        "Technical monitoring",
        "Dissent preservation"
      ],
      "constraints": [
        "Consent of signatories",
        "Releasability",
        "Neutral presentation",
        "Limited enforcement authority"
      ],
      "blind_spots": [
        "Covert action beyond inspection mandate",
        "Deliberate delays by sponsors"
      ],
      "resource_profile": "High legitimacy and evidence discipline; limited coercive reach.",
      "operational_style": "Transparent, corroborative, and procedurally neutral.",
      "typical_mission_types": [
        "Cross-border ceasefire verification",
        "Inspection-route interference review"
      ],
      "conflicts": [
        "Military secrecy",
        "State deniability",
        "Commercial confidentiality"
      ]
    },
    {
      "code": "SCI-22",
      "slug": "orison-infrastructure-research-consortium",
      "name": "Orison Infrastructure Research Consortium",
      "organizational_type": "Scientific or infrastructure consortium",
      "customer": "Member laboratories and infrastructure operators",
      "mandate": "Protect research integrity and assess technical anomalies affecting shared systems.",
      "jurisdiction": "Member laboratories, test ranges, and shared datasets",
      "motivations": [
        "Scientific continuity",
        "Safety",
        "Reproducibility",
        "Protection of collaborative access"
      ],
      "intelligence_priorities": [
        "Data provenance",
        "Sabotage",
        "Model contamination",
        "Unauthorized transfer"
      ],
      "collection_preferences": [
        "Technical audit",
        "Experiment logs",
        "Peer review",
        "Specialist interviews"
      ],
      "constraints": [
        "Research ethics",
        "Data-sharing agreements",
        "Safety certification",
        "Institutional politics"
      ],
      "blind_spots": [
        "Human-source manipulation",
        "Political use of findings"
      ],
      "resource_profile": "Deep technical expertise; limited field and coercive capability.",
      "operational_style": "Methodical, hypothesis driven, and review heavy.",
      "typical_mission_types": [
        "Corporate research-provenance dispute",
        "Sensor-array anomaly investigation"
      ],
      "conflicts": [
        "Customer deadlines",
        "Classification",
        "Commercial exclusivity"
      ]
    },
    {
      "code": "IND-09",
      "slug": "independent-source-protection-network",
      "name": "Independent Source Protection Network",
      "organizational_type": "Independent investigative network",
      "customer": "Protected sources and contracted public-interest investigators",
      "mandate": "Preserve source safety, authenticate disclosures, and deliver findings without exposing unnecessary identities.",
      "jurisdiction": "Contractual safe channels and negotiated operating spaces",
      "motivations": [
        "Source survival",
        "Investigative autonomy",
        "Credible disclosure",
        "Resistance to institutional capture"
      ],
      "intelligence_priorities": [
        "Retaliation indicators",
        "Document authenticity",
        "Surveillance pressure",
        "Disinformation against sources"
      ],
      "collection_preferences": [
        "Human-source handling",
        "Open-source corroboration",
        "Document forensics",
        "Distributed observation"
      ],
      "constraints": [
        "Limited funds",
        "No sovereign immunity",
        "Reliance on reputation",
        "High source-protection burden"
      ],
      "blind_spots": [
        "Limited technical infrastructure",
        "Dependence on volunteer networks"
      ],
      "resource_profile": "Flexible human networks and public research; limited protection and logistics.",
      "operational_style": "Distributed, cautious, and source centered.",
      "typical_mission_types": [
        "Protected-source extraction",
        "Internal leak and counterintelligence review"
      ],
      "conflicts": [
        "State secrecy",
        "Corporate injunctions",
        "Military operational security"
      ]
    }
  ]
}