{ "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/campaign-record.schema.json", "record_type": "campaign-record", "release": "IARPG-OPS-2", "version": "2.0.21-wip", "campaign_id": "iarpg-campaign-baseline-001", "record_id": "iarpg-campaign-record-turn-4", "baseline_version": "2.0.16-wip", "turn": 4, "source_dataset": { "campaign_state": "/campaign-state.json", "alliance_network": "/alliance-network.json" }, "applied_turns": [ { "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/campaign-turn.schema.json", "record_type": "campaign-turn", "release": "IARPG-OPS-2", "version": "1.0.0", "campaign_id": "iarpg-campaign-baseline-001", "baseline_version": "2.0.16-wip", "turn": 1, "scenario_event": { "id": "scenario-source-protection-breach", "title": "Protected source pattern exposed", "category": "source-protection", "trigger": "A joint warning product contains enough detail for observers to infer the identity of a protected community source.", "design_question": "Can partners preserve warning value while repairing source harm and narrowing unnecessary disclosure?" }, "response": { "id": "response-independent-trustee", "label": "Route sensitive material through an independent trustee", "summary": "Create a temporary trustee role that verifies necessity and strips identifying detail before partner release." }, "evidence_events": [ { "id": "evt-source-01", "kind": "provenance-review", "summary": "Two independent reviewers reproduce the identity inference from the published warning.", "source_class": "fictional-independent-review", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-source-02", "kind": "community-statement", "summary": "The affected source community requests removal, remedy, and a narrower handling rule.", "source_class": "fictional-affected-community-record", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-source-03", "kind": "internal-audit", "summary": "One partner disputes intent but confirms the release exceeded the minimum necessary detail.", "source_class": "fictional-oversight-record", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." } ], "consultation_questions": [ "Which information remains necessary for public safety?", "Who can authorize continued sharing?", "What remedy is owed to the affected source and community?" ], "consultation_decision": { "participants": [ "argent-watch", "mosaic-technology-forum", "cipher-commons" ], "decision_rule": "two-thirds approval with affected-community concurrence", "decision": "Use an independent trustee for two turns and publish the trustee mandate.", "recording_rule": "Record the mandate, evidence considered, abstentions, dissent, affected-community input, and review date.", "dissent": "Argent Watch objects to a nonmember reviewing sensitive provenance." }, "relationship_changes": [ { "relationship_id": "rel-08", "relationship_label": "Argent Watch · Mosaic Technology Forum", "relationship_type": "technology-cyber", "domain": "intelligence", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-08", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Assurance and disclosure channel in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-08" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-08", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 1, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "explanation": "Mosaic becomes the temporary technical trustee and carries more verification burden.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-source-01", "evt-source-02", "evt-source-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-08-v1" }, "reason_code": "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "explanation": "Mosaic becomes the temporary technical trustee and carries more verification burden.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-09", "relationship_label": "Argent Watch · Cipher Commons", "relationship_type": "rival-limited-cooperation", "domain": "governance", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-09", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Verification with mutual suspicion in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-09" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-09", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 1, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "OVERSIGHT_TRIGGERED", "explanation": "Argent and Cipher create a bounded oversight channel despite wider rivalry.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-source-01", "evt-source-02", "evt-source-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-09-v1" }, "reason_code": "OVERSIGHT_TRIGGERED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "explanation": "Argent and Cipher create a bounded oversight channel despite wider rivalry.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-01", "relationship_label": "Meridian Concord · Argent Watch", "relationship_type": "intelligence-liaison", "domain": "intelligence", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-01", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "high", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Joint warning partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-01" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-01", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 1, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "high", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "SOURCE_PROTECTION", "explanation": "The liaison narrows from integrated raw exchange to formal assessed exchange with trustee review.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-source-01", "evt-source-02", "evt-source-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-01-v1" }, "reason_code": "SOURCE_PROTECTION", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "explanation": "The liaison narrows from integrated raw exchange to formal assessed exchange with trustee review.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } } ], "internal_bloc_responses": [ { "faction_id": "mosaic-technology-forum", "bloc_name": "Assurance Group", "stance": "support", "rationale": "Views trustee review as a way to preserve interoperability without hiding risk." }, { "faction_id": "cipher-commons", "bloc_name": "Open Evidence Circle", "stance": "support with conditions", "rationale": "Requires publishable correction metadata and a fixed sunset date." }, { "faction_id": "argent-watch", "bloc_name": "Disruption Panel", "stance": "oppose", "rationale": "Warns that a trustee may expose sensitive methods." } ], "affected_community_consequences": [ { "community": "Protected source community", "likely_effect": "Receives a formal review role but may distrust an institutional trustee.", "safeguard": "Give the community an independent advocate and a revocable consent path.", "severity": "medium" }, { "community": "Warning recipients", "likely_effect": "Receive slower but better-bounded products.", "safeguard": "Publish service-level expectations and emergency exceptions.", "severity": "low" } ], "correction_path": { "trigger": "The trustee detects unnecessary detail or unsupported attribution.", "action": "Return the product for correction before release and log the blocked version." }, "mission_brief_ids": [ "campaign-mission-source-protection", "campaign-mission-rumor-correction" ], "reason_codes": [ "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "OVERSIGHT_TRIGGERED", "SOURCE_PROTECTION" ], "reversible": true, "truth_boundary": "This is a fictional campaign-design prototype. It does not describe current real-world alliances, predict human behavior, establish legal duties, or measure whether a faction is good, evil, friendly, hostile, recruitable, or dangerous.", "safety_boundary": "No real-world targeting, recruitability scoring, vulnerability exploitation, coercive persuasion, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, sabotage, weapons guidance, identity profiling, or instructions for joining real organizations.", "generated_by": "IARPG browser-local deterministic campaign console" }, { "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/campaign-turn.schema.json", "record_type": "campaign-turn", "release": "IARPG-OPS-2", "version": "1.0.0", "campaign_id": "iarpg-campaign-baseline-001", "baseline_version": "2.0.16-wip", "turn": 2, "scenario_event": { "id": "scenario-humanitarian-corridor", "title": "Humanitarian corridor authority disputed", "category": "humanitarian-access", "trigger": "Flooding isolates three districts while formal carriers, local councils, and an informal broker publish incompatible authority claims.", "design_question": "How can relief move without predetermining a territorial dispute or normalizing coercive access?" }, "response": { "id": "response-neutral-handoff", "label": "Use neutral city handoff points only", "summary": "Avoid the contested segment and move relief through city-administered public transfer points." }, "evidence_events": [ { "id": "evt-relief-01", "kind": "route-assessment", "summary": "Two routes are physically usable; neither has complete authorization records.", "source_class": "fictional-joint-assessment", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-relief-02", "kind": "community-testimony", "summary": "Residents identify one checkpoint as safer but report prior diversion at another.", "source_class": "fictional-community-testimony", "confidence": "medium", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-relief-03", "kind": "permit-record", "summary": "A temporary permit exists but its geographic scope is contested.", "source_class": "fictional-administrative-record", "confidence": "medium", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." } ], "consultation_questions": [ "Which actor can authorize each segment?", "How will beneficiaries report diversion or coercion?", "What happens when the temporary protocol expires?" ], "consultation_decision": { "participants": [ "haven-relief-network", "meridian-cities-compact" ], "decision_rule": "joint operational approval with public notice", "decision": "Limit deliveries to neutral handoff points and invite local pickup support.", "recording_rule": "Record the mandate, evidence considered, abstentions, dissent, affected-community input, and review date.", "dissent": "Residents with limited mobility warn that central pickup is not equal access." }, "relationship_changes": [ { "relationship_id": "rel-22", "relationship_label": "Meridian Cities Compact · Haven Relief Network", "relationship_type": "humanitarian-access", "domain": "humanitarian", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-22", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Shared emergency capacity in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-22" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-22", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 2, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "HUMANITARIAN_ACCESS", "explanation": "Cities assume greater last-mile burden.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-relief-01", "evt-relief-02", "evt-relief-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-22-v1" }, "reason_code": "HUMANITARIAN_ACCESS", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "explanation": "Cities assume greater last-mile burden.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-15", "relationship_label": "Haven Relief Network · Greyline Exchange", "relationship_type": "deconfliction", "domain": "humanitarian", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-15", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "contact", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "low", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Humanitarian passage channel in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-15" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-15", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 2, "lifecycle_stage": "adaptation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "explanation": "The broker offer is declined without treating the broker as hostile.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-relief-01", "evt-relief-02", "evt-relief-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-15-v1" }, "reason_code": "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "explanation": "The broker offer is declined without treating the broker as hostile.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-14", "relationship_label": "Haven Relief Network · Ironclad Logistics Cooperative", "relationship_type": "issue-coalition", "domain": "humanitarian", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-14", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Emergency supply bridge in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-14" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-14", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 2, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "explanation": "Haven shifts transport resources toward public handoff points.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-relief-01", "evt-relief-02", "evt-relief-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-14-v1" }, "reason_code": "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "explanation": "Haven shifts transport resources toward public handoff points.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } } ], "internal_bloc_responses": [ { "faction_id": "meridian-cities-compact", "bloc_name": "Services Secretariat", "stance": "support with conditions", "rationale": "Can operate public points but needs accessibility support." }, { "faction_id": "haven-relief-network", "bloc_name": "Rapid Access Cell", "stance": "oppose", "rationale": "Warns that the route is slower and may miss isolated residents." } ], "affected_community_consequences": [ { "community": "Residents with limited mobility", "likely_effect": "May face unequal access to central handoff points.", "safeguard": "Add mobile teams, accessible transport, and priority delivery.", "severity": "high" }, { "community": "Checkpoint communities", "likely_effect": "Avoid additional traffic and coercion risk.", "safeguard": "Continue monitoring in case route conditions change.", "severity": "low" } ], "correction_path": { "trigger": "Accessibility monitoring shows systematic exclusion.", "action": "Add mobile delivery or reopen the monitored bridge through a new consultation." }, "mission_brief_ids": [ "campaign-mission-humanitarian-access", "campaign-mission-community-consequence" ], "reason_codes": [ "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "HUMANITARIAN_ACCESS", "REFUSAL_RECORDED" ], "reversible": true, "truth_boundary": "This is a fictional campaign-design prototype. It does not describe current real-world alliances, predict human behavior, establish legal duties, or measure whether a faction is good, evil, friendly, hostile, recruitable, or dangerous.", "safety_boundary": "No real-world targeting, recruitability scoring, vulnerability exploitation, coercive persuasion, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, sabotage, weapons guidance, identity profiling, or instructions for joining real organizations.", "generated_by": "IARPG browser-local deterministic campaign console" }, { "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/campaign-turn.schema.json", "record_type": "campaign-turn", "release": "IARPG-OPS-2", "version": "1.0.0", "campaign_id": "iarpg-campaign-baseline-001", "baseline_version": "2.0.16-wip", "turn": 3, "scenario_event": { "id": "scenario-member-mandate", "title": "Member mandate changes after an election", "category": "mandate-and-consultation", "trigger": "A major member replaces a government that supported deep integration with one that favors narrow, issue-specific cooperation.", "design_question": "Can the relationship adapt without treating democratic change as betrayal or erasing existing dependencies?" }, "response": { "id": "response-orderly-deintegration", "label": "Run an orderly, reversible de-integration", "summary": "Document dependencies, hand off services, and move the relationship backward without crisis language." }, "evidence_events": [ { "id": "evt-mandate-01", "kind": "public-mandate", "summary": "The new administration publishes a narrower coalition mandate.", "source_class": "fictional-official-record", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-mandate-02", "kind": "implementation-note", "summary": "Liaison offices remain open, but two joint programs are paused.", "source_class": "fictional-administrative-record", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-mandate-03", "kind": "member-divergence", "summary": "Smaller members disagree on whether to deepen independent cooperation.", "source_class": "fictional-member-communique", "confidence": "medium", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." } ], "consultation_questions": [ "Which commitments are legally durable?", "Which programs require renewed political consent?", "How will smaller members avoid abrupt service loss?" ], "consultation_decision": { "participants": [ "meridian-concord", "mosaic-technology-forum" ], "decision_rule": "joint exit plan", "decision": "Move from integration to limited cooperation over two turns.", "recording_rule": "Record the mandate, evidence considered, abstentions, dissent, affected-community input, and review date.", "dissent": "Technical teams warn that some dependencies cannot unwind quickly." }, "relationship_changes": [ { "relationship_id": "rel-03", "relationship_label": "Meridian Concord · Mosaic Technology Forum", "relationship_type": "technology-cyber", "domain": "technology", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-03", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Assured interoperability program in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-03", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 3, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "MANDATE_CHANGED", "explanation": "The partners reduce dependency while preserving a bounded standards link.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-mandate-01", "evt-mandate-02", "evt-mandate-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-03-v1" }, "reason_code": "MANDATE_CHANGED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "explanation": "The partners reduce dependency while preserving a bounded standards link.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-04", "relationship_label": "Meridian Concord · Equator Assembly", "relationship_type": "hedging", "domain": "diplomacy", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-04", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Selective security and trade dialogue in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-04" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-04", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 3, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "explanation": "Dialogue continues while broader security integration ends.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-mandate-01", "evt-mandate-02", "evt-mandate-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-04-v1" }, "reason_code": "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "explanation": "Dialogue continues while broader security integration ends.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } } ], "internal_bloc_responses": [ { "faction_id": "mosaic-technology-forum", "bloc_name": "Open Systems Group", "stance": "support", "rationale": "Prefers portable standards that make de-integration survivable." }, { "faction_id": "mosaic-technology-forum", "bloc_name": "Assurance Group", "stance": "support with conditions", "rationale": "Requires compatibility tests during handoff." } ], "affected_community_consequences": [ { "community": "Users of shared technical services", "likely_effect": "Face migration and possible temporary inconvenience.", "safeguard": "Provide dual operation, accessible notices, and rollback.", "severity": "medium" } ], "correction_path": { "trigger": "A handoff fails or the mandate changes again.", "action": "Restore the previous safe version or open a new bounded agreement." }, "mission_brief_ids": [ "campaign-mission-disengagement", "campaign-mission-mediation" ], "reason_codes": [ "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "MANDATE_CHANGED" ], "reversible": true, "truth_boundary": "This is a fictional campaign-design prototype. It does not describe current real-world alliances, predict human behavior, establish legal duties, or measure whether a faction is good, evil, friendly, hostile, recruitable, or dangerous.", "safety_boundary": "No real-world targeting, recruitability scoring, vulnerability exploitation, coercive persuasion, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, sabotage, weapons guidance, identity profiling, or instructions for joining real organizations.", "generated_by": "IARPG browser-local deterministic campaign console" }, { "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/campaign-turn.schema.json", "record_type": "campaign-turn", "release": "IARPG-OPS-2", "version": "1.0.0", "campaign_id": "iarpg-campaign-baseline-001", "baseline_version": "2.0.16-wip", "turn": 4, "scenario_event": { "id": "scenario-independent-actor-claim", "title": "Unaffiliated actor claims faction authority", "category": "refusal-disengagement-and-reintegration", "trigger": "An unaffiliated individual claims to act for a civic movement and an informal broker, but no mandate, membership, or direction record is established.", "design_question": "How should factions disavow unsupported authority claims while preserving due process, safe disengagement, and possible reintegration?" }, "response": { "id": "response-clear-disavowal-and-support", "label": "Issue a narrow disavowal and offer voluntary disengagement support", "summary": "State that no mandate is established, protect unrelated participants, and offer a nonpunitive exit path." }, "evidence_events": [ { "id": "evt-actor-01", "kind": "mandate-check", "summary": "No valid mandate, membership, or tasking record is found.", "source_class": "fictional-governance-record", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-actor-02", "kind": "contact-record", "summary": "The actor participated in open community channels but had no privileged organizational access.", "source_class": "fictional-platform-record", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." }, { "id": "evt-actor-03", "kind": "public-claim", "summary": "The actor cites general ideological affinity as proof of authority.", "source_class": "fictional-public-statement", "confidence": "high", "contestability": "May be challenged through the correction process." } ], "consultation_questions": [ "What can be publicly disavowed without exposing unrelated people?", "What support exists for voluntary disengagement?", "What evidence would be required for later reintegration?" ], "consultation_decision": { "participants": [ "riverstone-autonomy-council", "commonweal-diaspora-assembly", "cipher-commons" ], "decision_rule": "joint factual statement with community review", "decision": "Disavow organizational authority without labeling the actor or community inherently dangerous.", "recording_rule": "Record the mandate, evidence considered, abstentions, dissent, affected-community input, and review date.", "dissent": "Community Defense Bloc wants stronger sanctions." }, "relationship_changes": [ { "relationship_id": "rel-18", "relationship_label": "Commonweal Diaspora Assembly · Riverstone Autonomy Council", "relationship_type": "sponsored-autonomy", "domain": "governance", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-18", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Civic support without command in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-18" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-18", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 4, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "explanation": "Commonweal and Riverstone define who may claim authority and how refusal is recorded.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-actor-01", "evt-actor-02", "evt-actor-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-18-v1" }, "reason_code": "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "explanation": "Commonweal and Riverstone define who may claim authority and how refusal is recorded.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-19", "relationship_label": "Commonweal Diaspora Assembly · Cipher Commons", "relationship_type": "strategic-partner", "domain": "governance", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-19", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Community verification partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-19" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-19", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 4, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "explanation": "Commonweal and Cipher publish a voluntary disengagement and support route.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-actor-01", "evt-actor-02", "evt-actor-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-19-v1" }, "reason_code": "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "explanation": "Commonweal and Cipher publish a voluntary disengagement and support route.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } }, { "relationship_id": "rel-20", "relationship_label": "Greyline Exchange · Riverstone Autonomy Council", "relationship_type": "intermediary", "domain": "diplomacy", "from_version": 1, "to_version": 2, "before": { "relationship_id": "rel-20", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "contact", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "minimal" }, { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "low", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Unstable brokerage channel in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-20" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, "after": { "relationship_id": "rel-20", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 4, "lifecycle_stage": "contact", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "minimal" }, { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "RUMOR_CORRECTED", "explanation": "The broker relationship remains unproven and the false authority claim is corrected.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-actor-01", "evt-actor-02", "evt-actor-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-20-v1" }, "reason_code": "RUMOR_CORRECTED", "domain_posture_updates": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "explanation": "The broker relationship remains unproven and the false authority claim is corrected.", "reversal": { "eligible": true, "trigger": "A later evidence event and consultation decision may restore the previous version.", "restores": "previous-version" } } ], "internal_bloc_responses": [ { "faction_id": "riverstone-autonomy-council", "bloc_name": "Negotiation Delegation", "stance": "support", "rationale": "Prioritizes clear mandate and nonpunitive exit." }, { "faction_id": "riverstone-autonomy-council", "bloc_name": "Community Defense Bloc", "stance": "oppose", "rationale": "Wants exclusion from all future participation." }, { "faction_id": "cipher-commons", "bloc_name": "Safety Moderation Circle", "stance": "support", "rationale": "Requires protection from harassment and guilt by association." } ], "affected_community_consequences": [ { "community": "Open community participants", "likely_effect": "Avoid being treated as organizational members by association.", "safeguard": "Publish the membership and authority standard; remove identity lists.", "severity": "high" }, { "community": "The unaffiliated actor", "likely_effect": "Receives a path to disengage without public humiliation.", "safeguard": "Offer voluntary support, appeal, and privacy protection.", "severity": "medium" } ], "correction_path": { "trigger": "A valid mandate or contrary evidence later appears.", "action": "Correct the attribution record and open a separate accountability process." }, "mission_brief_ids": [ "campaign-mission-disengagement", "campaign-mission-refusal" ], "reason_codes": [ "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "RUMOR_CORRECTED" ], "reversible": true, "truth_boundary": "This is a fictional campaign-design prototype. It does not describe current real-world alliances, predict human behavior, establish legal duties, or measure whether a faction is good, evil, friendly, hostile, recruitable, or dangerous.", "safety_boundary": "No real-world targeting, recruitability scoring, vulnerability exploitation, coercive persuasion, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, sabotage, weapons guidance, identity profiling, or instructions for joining real organizations.", "generated_by": "IARPG browser-local deterministic campaign console" } ], "current_relationship_versions": [ { "relationship_id": "rel-01", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 1, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "high", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "SOURCE_PROTECTION", "explanation": "The liaison narrows from integrated raw exchange to formal assessed exchange with trustee review.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-source-01", "evt-source-02", "evt-source-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-01-v1", "x_state_annotation": "Unknown state extension preserved with the imported source." }, { "relationship_id": "rel-02", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "high", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Resilience corridor partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-02" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-03", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 3, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "MANDATE_CHANGED", "explanation": "The partners reduce dependency while preserving a bounded standards link.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-mandate-01", "evt-mandate-02", "evt-mandate-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-03-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-04", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 3, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "explanation": "Dialogue continues while broader security integration ends.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-mandate-01", "evt-mandate-02", "evt-mandate-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-04-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-05", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "high", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors South–north corridor program in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-05" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-06", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Technology sovereignty partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-06" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-07", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Regional relief compact in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-07" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-08", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 1, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "explanation": "Mosaic becomes the temporary technical trustee and carries more verification burden.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-source-01", "evt-source-02", "evt-source-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-08-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-09", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 1, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "OVERSIGHT_TRIGGERED", "explanation": "Argent and Cipher create a bounded oversight channel despite wider rivalry.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-source-01", "evt-source-02", "evt-source-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-09-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-10", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Maintenance and carrier partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-10" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-11", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Route access under local consent in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-11" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-12", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Open verification partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-12" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-13", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Shared-services assurance program in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-13" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-14", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 2, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BURDEN_REBALANCED", "explanation": "Haven shifts transport resources toward public handoff points.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-relief-01", "evt-relief-02", "evt-relief-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-14-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-15", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 2, "lifecycle_stage": "adaptation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "explanation": "The broker offer is declined without treating the broker as hostile.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-relief-01", "evt-relief-02", "evt-relief-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-15-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-16", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Competing contract markets in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-16" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-17", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Family connection and recovery partnership in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-17" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-18", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 4, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "source-heavy", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "REFUSAL_RECORDED", "explanation": "Commonweal and Riverstone define who may claim authority and how refusal is recorded.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-actor-01", "evt-actor-02", "evt-actor-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-18-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-19", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 4, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "DISENGAGEMENT_SUPPORTED", "explanation": "Commonweal and Cipher publish a voluntary disengagement and support route.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-actor-01", "evt-actor-02", "evt-actor-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-19-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-20", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 4, "lifecycle_stage": "contact", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "minimal" }, { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "minimal" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "RUMOR_CORRECTED", "explanation": "The broker relationship remains unproven and the false authority claim is corrected.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-actor-01", "evt-actor-02", "evt-actor-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-20-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-21", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "medium", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Mediation and local-services forum in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-21" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-22", "version": 2, "effective_turn": 2, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "infrastructure", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "target-heavy", "source_dependency": "medium", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "HUMANITARIAN_ACCESS", "explanation": "Cities assume greater last-mile burden.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evt-relief-01", "evt-relief-02", "evt-relief-03" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": "relationship-history-rel-22-v1" }, { "relationship_id": "rel-23", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "formalization", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "formal" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "formal" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "high", "target_dependency": "high", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Financial warning liaison in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-23" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-24", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "limited-cooperation", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "diplomacy", "cooperation": "bounded" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "bounded" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "available", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "mixed", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Small-state bargaining coalition in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-24" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-25", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "technology", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "governance", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Verification versus manipulation in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-25" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-26", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "integration", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "security", "cooperation": "integrated" }, { "domain": "humanitarian", "cooperation": "integrated" } ], "burden_distribution": "balanced", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "routine", "evidence_confidence": "high", "community_impact": "beneficial", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Civilian-protection channel in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-26" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null }, { "relationship_id": "rel-27", "version": 1, "effective_turn": 0, "lifecycle_stage": "stress-test", "domain_postures": [ { "domain": "intelligence", "cooperation": "contested" }, { "domain": "trade", "cooperation": "contested" } ], "burden_distribution": "contested", "source_dependency": "low", "target_dependency": "low", "consultation_state": "active", "evidence_confidence": "medium", "community_impact": "strained", "reason_code": "BASELINE_PUBLICATION", "explanation": "Baseline state mirrors Financial integrity contest in the fictional Alliance Observatory and preserves its domain-specific scope.", "evidence_event_ids": [ "evidence-baseline-rel-27" ], "reversible": true, "supersedes": null } ], "counts": { "committed_turns": 4, "changed_relationships": 11, "relationship_versions": 27 }, "truth_boundary": "This is a fictional campaign-design prototype. It does not describe current real-world alliances, predict human behavior, establish legal duties, or measure whether a faction is good, evil, friendly, hostile, recruitable, or dangerous.", "safety_boundary": "No real-world targeting, recruitability scoring, vulnerability exploitation, coercive persuasion, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, sabotage, weapons guidance, identity profiling, or instructions for joining real organizations.", "generated_by": "IARPG browser-local deterministic campaign console", "x_iarpg_example_extension": { "preserve": true, "note": "Second example extension retained without affecting deterministic replay." } }