--- uai: "1.0" type: evidence-attribution-review-readiness status: active stable_id: iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-readiness project: iarpg.com release: IARPG-OPS-2 version: "2.0.30-wip" review_state: current-until-superseded --- # Evidence Attribution Human-Review Readiness ## Current Publication Contract - Twelve preserved source wrappers have twelve non-scoring reviewer packets. - The seventy-two preserved 2.0.29 dispositions have seventy-two individually addressable empty adjudication slots. - Every source receives eight review categories; every disposition receives three claim-level prompts. - Twelve source-specific original-language and locally authored source requirement records remain unanswered. - Twelve model-generated wording tests distinguish actor claims, platform findings, intelligence assessments, court allegations, formal judgments, reach, causal effect, role, symbol, metadata, source-chain, and translation claims. - Real reviewers: **0**. Qualified translation approvals: **0**. Completed adjudications: **0**. - Public state: reviewed with limitations and publication-blocked. Evidence: [protocol findings](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-human-review-readiness-and-translation-quality-protocol.md#findings), [fairness findings](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-packets-cross-source-fairness-and-unresolved-approval.md#findings), [machine index](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/index.json), and [public method](../evidence-attribution-review-readiness.php#review-readiness-boundary). ## Review Sequence Verify custody; recheck current facts and law; review original language and translation; trace source origins and attribution rung; inspect affected-community, privacy, rights, and remedy evidence; record a human finding; conduct accountable adjudication; preserve correction and supersession; publish only after direct evidence clears every blocker. ## Separate Evidence Fields Claim status, analytic confidence, source reliability, attribution rung, source origin chain, translation state, correction history, reviewer finding, and adjudication remain separate. No field is inferred from another. ## Source-Specific Routing - [Information Operations, Disinformation, and Neutral Evidence Presentation](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-information-operations-disinformation-and-neutral-evidence-presentation.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation.json) - [Comparative Intelligence Oversight, Transparency, and Remedy](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-comparative-intelligence-oversight-transparency-and-remedy.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/comparative-intelligence-oversight-remedy.json) - [OSINT Verification and Attribution Under Uncertainty](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-osint-verification-and-attribution-under-uncertainty.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty.json) - [Anonymous in Geopolitical Conflicts and Crisis Information](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-in-geopolitical-conflicts-and-crisis-information.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-geopolitical-conflict-analysis.json) - [Anonymous Symbols, Media Representation, and Internal Disagreement](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-symbols-media-representation-and-internal-disagreement.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-symbols-disputes.json) - [Anonymous Campaigns: Chronology, Claims, Attribution, and Outcomes](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-claims-attribution-and-outcomes.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-campaigns-chronology.json) - [Anonymous: Origins, Naming, and Early Development (2003–2010)](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-origins-naming-and-early-development.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-origins-early-history.json) - [Anonymous in Courts and Law-Enforcement Records](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-in-courts-and-law-enforcement-records.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-legal-cases.json) - [Anonymous Sources, Whistleblower Protections, and OSINT Verification Under Uncertainty](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-protections-and-osint-verification.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint.json) - [Anonymous and Other Leaderless or Pseudonymous Movements](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-and-other-leaderless-or-pseudonymous-movements.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/leaderless-movements-comparison.json) - [Anonymous: Structure, Membership Claims, and Decision-Making](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-structure-membership-claims-and-decision-making.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-structure-membership.json) - [Surveillance, Metadata, Data Brokers, and Identity Inference](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-surveillance-metadata-data-brokers-and-identity-inference.md#review-readiness) — [packet](../evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/metadata-identity-inference.json) ## Public-Wording Boundary - Actor-controlled statements use “claimed.” - Platform conclusions remain attributed to the platform unless independently reproducible. - Intelligence assessments retain claimant and confidence. - Indictments and complaints use “alleged”; judgments use exact procedural verbs. - Reach metrics do not establish unique exposure or persuasion. - Causal effect requires causal evidence. - Symbols, amplification, administration, organizing, technical action, sponsorship, direction, and command remain separate. - Observed metadata, derived attributes, identity hypotheses, and decision use remain separate. ## Safety and Non-Scoring Boundary Do not identify or profile private people. Do not publish operational intrusion, surveillance, evasion, targeting, coercion, weapons, recruitment, or influence-execution instructions. Do not create country, reviewer, community, organization, source, susceptibility, threat, loyalty, morality, legitimacy, protected-characteristic, recruitability, or targetability scores. ## Durable References - [Review-readiness and translation-quality protocol](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-human-review-readiness-and-translation-quality-protocol.md#findings) - [Cross-source fairness and unresolved approval](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-review-packets-cross-source-fairness-and-unresolved-approval.md#findings) - [2.0.29 evidence-attribution integration](../docs/long-term-memory/reports/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-network-research-integration-report.md#findings) - [Durable pointer ledger](long-term-memory.uai#evidence-attribution-review-readiness)