{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-fairness.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-fairness",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/fairness.json",
  "equal_burden": true,
  "source_count": 12,
  "disposition_count": 72,
  "source_questions_per_packet": 8,
  "claim_questions_per_disposition": 3,
  "adjudication_slots_per_disposition": 1,
  "question_category_counts": {
    "legal-status": 12,
    "current-facts": 12,
    "translation": 12,
    "technical-attribution": 12,
    "affected-community-perspectives": 12,
    "privacy": 12,
    "rights": 12,
    "remedy": 12
  },
  "reviewer_owned_fields_answered": 0,
  "completed_adjudications": 0,
  "exceptions": [],
  "unresolved_review": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "fairness_boundary": "Equal structure does not prove equal source quality, legal complexity, translation burden, local representation, factual correctness, or neutral outcomes. Differences must be justified by evidence rather than rankings."
}