{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-campaigns-chronology.json",
  "source_id": "anonymous-campaigns-chronology",
  "title": "Anonymous Campaigns: Chronology, Claims, Attribution, and Outcomes",
  "short_title": "Campaign chronology, claims, and outcomes",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "Anonymous Campaigns Chronology Research(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Anonymous Campaigns Chronology Research(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Anonymous%20Campaigns%20Chronology%20Research%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 54820,
    "sha256": "67e97c89419a35190630a20bdc2c93613608a5d82caf43ee6b4210c24003adc5",
    "declared_cutoff": "2026-07-24"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/anonymous-campaigns-chronology-claims-attribution-and-outcomes#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "anonymous-campaigns-chronology-claims-attribution-and-outcomes",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/anonymous-campaigns-chronology.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "Which acts were alleged, charged, pleaded, convicted, acquitted, dismissed, or never adjudicated, and which legal status is current?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Have appeals, corrections, platform records, campaign claims, or subsequent investigations changed the chronology or outcome?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Do translated campaign names, legal terms, official statements, and local reporting preserve uncertainty and procedural posture?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "Which event facts are independently corroborated, which attribution claims are actor-controlled, and which reach or effect claims lack evidence?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "What harms, service impacts, privacy exposure, public-interest claims, and disagreements were documented by affected people or local institutions?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Does the chronology exclude raw stolen data, private identities, credentials, and unnecessary details about vulnerable targets or witnesses?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Does the account preserve due process, source safety, expression, privacy, proportionality, and the distinction between a defendant and a broad label?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "What corrections, restorations, notifications, legal remedies, or public record changes followed each campaign?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-01",
      "topic": "chronology layers",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Separate claim, event, corroboration, legal outcome, and correction dates.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-06-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'chronology layers' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Separate claim, event, corroboration, legal outcome, and correction dates.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-02",
      "topic": "legal attribution",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Use court records to describe the named conduct adjudicated, not to generalize guilt to a movement or label.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-06-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'legal attribution' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Use court records to describe the named conduct adjudicated, not to generalize guilt to a movement or label.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-03",
      "topic": "claimed outcomes",
      "preserved_disposition": "bounded",
      "preserved_statement": "Distinguish public-site outage, data publication, identity claim, strategic impact, and long-term outcome.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-06-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'claimed outcomes' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Distinguish public-site outage, data publication, identity claim, strategic impact, and long-term outcome.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-04",
      "topic": "case currency",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck judgments, appeals, platform status, and contemporary campaign claims before reuse.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-06-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'case currency' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck judgments, appeals, platform status, and contemporary campaign claims before reuse.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-05",
      "topic": "operational methods",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not publish tools, attack procedures, credentials, raw stolen data, target lists, or evasion steps.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-06-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'operational methods' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not publish tools, attack procedures, credentials, raw stolen data, target lists, or evasion steps.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-06",
      "topic": "correction duty",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Prominently correct recycled data, false identities, inflated counts, and conflated attribution.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-06-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'correction duty' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Prominently correct recycled data, false identities, inflated counts, and conflated attribution.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-06-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-campaigns-chronology-claims-attribution-and-outcomes#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}