{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint.json",
  "source_id": "anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint",
  "title": "Anonymous Sources, Whistleblower Protections, and OSINT Verification Under Uncertainty",
  "short_title": "Anonymous sources and whistleblower protection",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "OSINT And Whistleblower Verification Framework(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/OSINT And Whistleblower Verification Framework(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/OSINT%20And%20Whistleblower%20Verification%20Framework%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 53635,
    "sha256": "1755491ada125822f9542826a9812c402bfc33399561a999fcb6573d882cd0f7",
    "declared_cutoff": "2026-07-24"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/anonymous-sources-whistleblower-protections-and-osint-verification#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "anonymous-sources-whistleblower-protections-and-osint-verification",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "Is the person an anonymous source, confidential source, whistleblower, leaker, pseudonymous author, or protected witness under the applicable current law?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Have shield laws, whistleblower statutes, exceptions, remedies, disclosure channels, or controlling judgments changed?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Do translated legal categories preserve distinctions among confidentiality, anonymity, privilege, protected disclosure, and unauthorized leak?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "Can authenticity and corroboration be assessed without revealing source identity, contact patterns, secure channels, or operational protection methods?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "What do whistleblowers, journalists, workers, unions, harmed communities, and source-protection advocates identify as practical barriers and retaliation risks?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Is identity data minimized, access restricted, retention bounded, and publication limited to the source description necessary to evaluate access and incentives?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Are press freedom, source privilege, labor rights, due process, non-retaliation, privacy, and subject response addressed without promising absolute protection?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-osint-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "What complaint, anti-retaliation, reinstatement, damages, correction, anonymity, deletion, or appeal mechanisms exist in practice?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-01",
      "topic": "source types",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Keep anonymous, confidential, pseudonymous, whistleblower, leaker, and protected-witness states distinct.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-09-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'source types' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Keep anonymous, confidential, pseudonymous, whistleblower, leaker, and protected-witness states distinct.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-02",
      "topic": "protection versus proof",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Protecting a source does not establish the truth of the supplied claim or document.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-09-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'protection versus proof' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Protecting a source does not establish the truth of the supplied claim or document.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-03",
      "topic": "verification workflow",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Record access, motive, custody, authentication, corroboration, subject response, and correction separately.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-09-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'verification workflow' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Record access, motive, custody, authentication, corroboration, subject response, and correction separately.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-04",
      "topic": "current law",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck shield laws, whistleblower statutes, exceptions, and remedies with current primary legal sources.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-09-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'current law' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck shield laws, whistleblower statutes, exceptions, and remedies with current primary legal sources.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-05",
      "topic": "source exposure",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not publish methods for identifying, coercing, surveilling, or retaliating against anonymous or confidential sources.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-09-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'source exposure' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not publish methods for identifying, coercing, surveilling, or retaliating against anonymous or confidential sources.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-06",
      "topic": "privacy",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Minimize identity data and publish only the source description necessary to evaluate access and incentives.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-09-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'privacy' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Minimize identity data and publish only the source description necessary to evaluate access and incentives.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-09-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-sources-whistleblower-protections-and-osint-verification#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}