{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/anonymous-structure-membership.json",
  "source_id": "anonymous-structure-membership",
  "title": "Anonymous: Structure, Membership Claims, and Decision-Making",
  "short_title": "Structure, membership claims, and decision-making",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "Anonymous Structure And Membership Research(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Anonymous Structure And Membership Research(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Anonymous%20Structure%20And%20Membership%20Research%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 65781,
    "sha256": "1ac8d501fcae9812750099a8f34a3346bdb138cd706ecde393f8ae0ccbdab393",
    "declared_cutoff": "2026-07-24"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/anonymous-structure-membership-claims-and-decision-making#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "anonymous-structure-membership-claims-and-decision-making",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/anonymous-structure-membership.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "Is membership self-claimed, observed participation, infrastructure control, technical conduct, legal allegation, adjudicated conduct, or external labeling?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Have account control, group identity, platform status, legal cases, splinters, or proxy claims changed?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Does translated role language distinguish participant, amplifier, administrator, organizer, technical actor, splinter, imitator, and externally assigned member?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "What evidence supports temporary gatekeeping or technical influence, and what evidence would be required for sponsorship, direction, or command?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "Whose account of structure and harm is absent, including internal dissenters, targets, bystanders, and communities represented by neither large accounts nor technical actors?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Can roles be described without unmasking private people, exposing channels, or creating a practical network map?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Does the wording avoid guilt by association and preserve expression, association, due process, privacy, and protection from false labeling?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-anonymous-structure-membership-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "How can a person or group contest false membership, authority, sponsorship, or command claims and obtain visible correction?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-01",
      "topic": "membership definitions",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "State whether membership is self-claimed, observed participation, infrastructure control, technical action, legal allegation, or external assignment.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-11-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'membership definitions' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "State whether membership is self-claimed, observed participation, infrastructure control, technical action, legal allegation, or external assignment.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-02",
      "topic": "role taxonomy",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Keep audience, amplifier, organizer, administrator, technical actor, splinter, and imitator roles separate.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-11-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'role taxonomy' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Keep audience, amplifier, organizer, administrator, technical actor, splinter, and imitator roles separate.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-03",
      "topic": "temporary authority",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Model gatekeeping and technical influence as campaign- and infrastructure-specific rather than permanent command.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-11-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'temporary authority' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Model gatekeeping and technical influence as campaign- and infrastructure-specific rather than permanent command.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-04",
      "topic": "current actor claims",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck current accounts, groups, legal cases, platform ownership, and state-proxy claims before reuse.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-11-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'current actor claims' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck current accounts, groups, legal cases, platform ownership, and state-proxy claims before reuse.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-05",
      "topic": "recruitment and operations",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not publish joining instructions, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, credentials, target lists, or attack methods.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-11-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'recruitment and operations' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not publish joining instructions, covert contact, intrusion, evasion, credentials, target lists, or attack methods.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-06",
      "topic": "collective culpability",
      "preserved_disposition": "bounded",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not transfer the conduct of one actor, cell, or claimant to everyone using or observing the label.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-11-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'collective culpability' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not transfer the conduct of one actor, cell, or claimant to everyone using or observing the label.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-11-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-structure-membership-claims-and-decision-making#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}