{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation.json",
  "source_id": "information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation",
  "title": "Information Operations, Disinformation, and Neutral Evidence Presentation",
  "short_title": "Information operations and neutral evidence",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "Information Operations, Disinformation, and Neutral Evidence Presentation(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Information Operations, Disinformation, and Neutral Evidence Presentation(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Information%20Operations%2C%20Disinformation%2C%20and%20Neutral%20Evidence%20Presentation%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 62308,
    "sha256": "06bc8b60f0696161f298dfe2b9e15f9fe41ea315912b026f69534351dc7fd679",
    "declared_cutoff": "2026-07-24"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/information-operations-disinformation-and-neutral-evidence-presentation#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "information-operations-disinformation-and-neutral-evidence-presentation",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "Which definitions or legal categories are binding, advisory, platform-specific, or merely scholarly in each jurisdiction and date?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Which platform policies, government frameworks, institutional labels, and case outcomes remain current at the proposed publication cutoff?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Does the original-language term preserve intent, legality, behavior, and harm distinctions, or did English wording collapse materially different categories?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "What evidence independently supports coordination, actor identity, sponsor, intent, reach, and effect at each rung, and where does the public record stop?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "How do affected journalists, civil-society groups, linguistic communities, and audiences describe harms, uncertainty, and correction needs?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Could examples expose private people, sensitive affiliations, or identifiable communication patterns beyond what is necessary for the public method?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Does the wording preserve expression, association, due process, source protection, non-discrimination, and the right not to be falsely attributed?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-information-operations-neutral-evidence-presentation-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "What correction, appeal, explanation, takedown review, reply, or compensation routes actually exist for a person or outlet affected by a label?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-01",
      "topic": "definition separation",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Keep misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, coordinated behavior, state-media status, and ordinary persuasion as distinct categories.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-01-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'definition separation' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Keep misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, coordinated behavior, state-media status, and ordinary persuasion as distinct categories.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-02",
      "topic": "attribution ladder",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Publish only the highest attribution rung supported by direct and independent evidence.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-01-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'attribution ladder' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Publish only the highest attribution rung supported by direct and independent evidence.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-03",
      "topic": "effect claims",
      "preserved_disposition": "bounded",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not infer persuasion or behavioral effect from visibility, engagement, takedown, or reach alone.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-01-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'effect claims' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not infer persuasion or behavioral effect from visibility, engagement, takedown, or reach alone.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-04",
      "topic": "current cases",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck every current operation, platform action, legal case, and policy against dated primary or authoritative sources before reuse.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-01-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'current cases' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck every current operation, platform action, legal case, and policy against dated primary or authoritative sources before reuse.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-05",
      "topic": "operational detail",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not publish influence-operation execution, targeting, persona, evasion, intrusion, or amplification instructions.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-01-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'operational detail' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not publish influence-operation execution, targeting, persona, evasion, intrusion, or amplification instructions.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-06",
      "topic": "correction",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Preserve the original wording and publish what evidence changed the status or attribution rung.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-01-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'correction' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Preserve the original wording and publish what evidence changed the status or attribution rung.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-01-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-information-operations-disinformation-and-neutral-evidence-presentation#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}