{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/leaderless-movements-comparison.json",
  "source_id": "leaderless-movements-comparison",
  "title": "Anonymous and Other Leaderless or Pseudonymous Movements",
  "short_title": "Comparative leaderless and pseudonymous movements",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "Leaderless Movements Structural Analysis(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Leaderless Movements Structural Analysis(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Leaderless%20Movements%20Structural%20Analysis%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 57522,
    "sha256": "9673ecc759b62384bb9c5e7c5684c03f18f35bebfb3b0f15a741f0c59875ff73",
    "declared_cutoff": "2026-07-24"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/anonymous-and-other-leaderless-or-pseudonymous-movements#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "anonymous-and-other-leaderless-or-pseudonymous-movements",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/leaderless-movements-comparison.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "What legal status applies to the specific act and person, rather than to an umbrella identity or movement label?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Have movement names, institutions, laws, arrests, platforms, or governance practices changed since the source cutoff?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Do translated movement slogans, role names, and organizing concepts preserve local political and cultural meaning?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "What evidence distinguishes audience, amplifier, administrator, organizer, technical actor, sponsor, direction, and command?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "How do participants, dissenters, targets, bystanders, disabled people, minority communities, and local researchers describe structure, accountability, and harm?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Does the comparison avoid identifying private participants, mapping networks, or exposing vulnerable organizers and communities?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Are association, protest, expression, privacy, due process, infiltration, bystander harm, and non-discrimination included symmetrically?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-leaderless-movements-comparison-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "What internal, legal, platform, or community correction and accountability routes exist when a leaderless network causes harm or is falsely attributed?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-01",
      "topic": "leaderless structure",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Leaderless systems may still contain temporary gatekeepers, administrators, specialists, and informal power concentrations.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-10-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'leaderless structure' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Leaderless systems may still contain temporary gatekeepers, administrators, specialists, and informal power concentrations.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-02",
      "topic": "comparison method",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Compare structure, participation, decision process, continuity, accountability, and attribution without ranking ideologies.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-10-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'comparison method' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Compare structure, participation, decision process, continuity, accountability, and attribution without ranking ideologies.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-03",
      "topic": "membership inference",
      "preserved_disposition": "bounded",
      "preserved_statement": "Shared symbols, hashtags, location, or audience overlap do not establish membership or command.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-10-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'membership inference' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Shared symbols, hashtags, location, or audience overlap do not establish membership or command.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-04",
      "topic": "current movement status",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck current organizations, laws, arrests, platform use, and governance claims before reuse.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-10-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'current movement status' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck current organizations, laws, arrests, platform use, and governance claims before reuse.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-05",
      "topic": "operational tactics",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not reproduce evasion, intrusion, crowd-control defeat, targeting, or clandestine coordination instructions.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-10-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'operational tactics' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not reproduce evasion, intrusion, crowd-control defeat, targeting, or clandestine coordination instructions.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-06",
      "topic": "rights",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Include association, expression, due process, privacy, infiltration, bystander harm, and remedy in structural comparisons.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-10-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'rights' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Include association, expression, due process, privacy, infiltration, bystander harm, and remedy in structural comparisons.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-10-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-anonymous-and-other-leaderless-or-pseudonymous-movements#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}