{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/metadata-identity-inference.json",
  "source_id": "metadata-identity-inference",
  "title": "Surveillance, Metadata, Data Brokers, and Identity Inference",
  "short_title": "Metadata, data brokers, and identity inference",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "Metadata And Identity Inference Analysis(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Metadata And Identity Inference Analysis(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/Metadata%20And%20Identity%20Inference%20Analysis%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 69689,
    "sha256": "dba25bc69f8ce1764953a784ee4f05178e39d431c9677a47388755981f9136e0",
    "declared_cutoff": "researched 2026-07-24; current-through 2026-07-15"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/surveillance-metadata-data-brokers-and-identity-inference#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "surveillance-metadata-data-brokers-and-identity-inference",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/metadata-identity-inference.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "Which privacy, consumer, civil-rights, evidence, surveillance, data-broker, notice, correction, deletion, and appeal rules currently govern the use?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Have laws, enforcement orders, vendors, deployments, retention periods, litigation, or municipal systems changed?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Do translated legal and technical terms preserve the difference among observed data, derived attributes, identity hypotheses, risk labels, and decisions?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "What transformation produced the inference, with what source data, assumptions, error, validation, and limits—and can it be reviewed without enabling re-identification?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "How do people affected by housing, employment, policing, health, migration, or other decisions describe errors, disparate effects, and barriers to challenge?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Is the minimum necessary data used, are private identities excluded from publication, and are access, retention, sharing, and deletion boundaries documented?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Are equality, due process, notice, explanation, correction, disability access, privacy, and protection from protected-characteristic profiling addressed?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-metadata-identity-inference-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "What human review, correction, deletion, appeal, compensation, policy change, or court remedy is available and practically usable?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-01",
      "topic": "observation versus inference",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Keep observed metadata, inferred attribute, identity hypothesis, confidence, and decision use separate.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-12-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'observation versus inference' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Keep observed metadata, inferred attribute, identity hypothesis, confidence, and decision use separate.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-02",
      "topic": "de-identification",
      "preserved_disposition": "bounded",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not describe stripped identifiers as a guarantee against re-identification or sensitive inference.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-12-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'de-identification' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not describe stripped identifiers as a guarantee against re-identification or sensitive inference.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-03",
      "topic": "automated decisions",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Record proxy effects, false positives, affected communities, correction, appeal, and remedy.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-12-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'automated decisions' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Record proxy effects, false positives, affected communities, correction, appeal, and remedy.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-04",
      "topic": "current law and deployments",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck privacy law, enforcement, litigation, municipal systems, vendors, and deployment status before reuse.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-12-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'current law and deployments' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck privacy law, enforcement, litigation, municipal systems, vendors, and deployment status before reuse.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-05",
      "topic": "identity targeting",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not publish re-identification recipes, private-person profiling, surveillance evasion, target lists, or data-broker acquisition guidance.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-12-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'identity targeting' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not publish re-identification recipes, private-person profiling, surveillance evasion, target lists, or data-broker acquisition guidance.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-06",
      "topic": "scoring boundary",
      "preserved_disposition": "rejected-for-public-reuse",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not create protected-characteristic, credibility, capacity, susceptibility, threat, loyalty, recruitability, or targetability scores.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-12-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'scoring boundary' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not create protected-characteristic, credibility, capacity, susceptibility, threat, loyalty, recruitability, or targetability scores.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-12-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-surveillance-metadata-data-brokers-and-identity-inference#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}