{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution-review-packet.schema.json",
  "record_type": "iarpg-evidence-attribution-review-packet",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/packets/osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty.json",
  "source_id": "osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty",
  "title": "OSINT Verification and Attribution Under Uncertainty",
  "short_title": "OSINT verification and attribution",
  "review_state": "awaiting-qualified-human-review",
  "publication_state": "blocked",
  "preserved_source": {
    "original_filename": "OSINT Verification and Attribution Under Uncertainty(2).md",
    "path": "docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/OSINT Verification and Attribution Under Uncertainty(2).md",
    "url": "/docs/source-files/evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-networks/OSINT%20Verification%20and%20Attribution%20Under%20Uncertainty%282%29.md",
    "bytes": 61286,
    "sha256": "5c87b40f4f9b0244f07ab6988002c5fe9921b19a5fb4de9b1b47fc6fe77b840e",
    "declared_cutoff": "2026-07-24"
  },
  "preserved_wrapper": {
    "url": "/docs/report/osint-verification-and-attribution-under-uncertainty#reviewed-synthesis",
    "report_slug": "osint-verification-and-attribution-under-uncertainty",
    "review_state": "reviewed-with-limitations"
  },
  "preserved_review_register": "/evidence-attribution-research-review-register.json",
  "source_requirement": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/source-requirements/osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty.json",
  "source_level_questions": [
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-01",
      "category": "legal-status",
      "question": "Which authentication, evidentiary, privacy, copyright, source-protection, and publication rules apply to the record in its actual jurisdiction?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-02",
      "category": "current-facts",
      "question": "Are cited standards, platform features, court records, incidents, and correction statuses still current at the proposed cutoff?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-03",
      "category": "translation",
      "question": "Was the earliest accessible wording checked in the original language, including names, dates, evidential markers, modality, and causal verbs?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-04",
      "category": "technical-attribution",
      "question": "Can origin, directness, independence, authenticity, custody, and corroboration be reconstructed without turning the method into private-person identification or intrusion guidance?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-05",
      "category": "affected-community-perspectives",
      "question": "Do local reporters or affected communities identify context, harms, missing records, or interpretation conflicts not visible in external OSINT?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-06",
      "category": "privacy",
      "question": "Can the claim be evaluated with data minimization, redaction, and aggregation rather than publishing identifiers, precise locations, or sensitive metadata?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-07",
      "category": "rights",
      "question": "Does the method preserve reply, correction, presumption, source protection, equality, and the distinction between authentication and guilt?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "EARR-Q-osint-verification-attribution-uncertainty-08",
      "category": "remedy",
      "question": "What visible correction, supersession, appeal, subject response, and deletion-request process applies if the verification later changes?",
      "required_evidence": "Qualified, attributable, dated evidence appropriate to this category; source origin and scope must be recorded.",
      "reviewer_response": null,
      "reviewer_notes": null,
      "reviewer_identity_reference": null,
      "review_status": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "disposition_reviews": [
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-01",
      "topic": "independence",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Ten articles derived from one statement remain one evidentiary origin chain, not ten independent confirmations.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-03-01.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-01-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'independence' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Ten articles derived from one statement remain one evidentiary origin chain, not ten independent confirmations.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-01-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-01-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-02",
      "topic": "three-axis model",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Keep claim status, analytic confidence, and source reliability separate.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-03-02.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-02-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'three-axis model' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Keep claim status, analytic confidence, and source reliability separate.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-02-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-02-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-03",
      "topic": "provenance tools",
      "preserved_disposition": "bounded",
      "preserved_statement": "Treat content credentials and metadata as origin signals, not automatic truth or falsity verdicts.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-03-03.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-03-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'provenance tools' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Treat content credentials and metadata as origin signals, not automatic truth or falsity verdicts.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-03-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-03-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-04",
      "topic": "current examples",
      "preserved_disposition": "requires-current-verification",
      "preserved_statement": "Recheck cited events, platform statements, court filings, and institutional standards before factual reuse.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-03-04.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-04-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'current examples' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Recheck cited events, platform statements, court filings, and institutional standards before factual reuse.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-04-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-04-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-05",
      "topic": "private-person identification",
      "preserved_disposition": "safety-restricted",
      "preserved_statement": "Do not convert verification methods into stalking, private-person identification, credential discovery, evasion, or intrusion guidance.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-03-05.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-05-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'private-person identification' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Do not convert verification methods into stalking, private-person identification, credential discovery, evasion, or intrusion guidance.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-05-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-05-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-06",
      "topic": "versioning",
      "preserved_disposition": "retained-method-guidance",
      "preserved_statement": "Use visible review dates, supersession links, and preserved earlier dispositions rather than silent certainty edits.",
      "adjudication_slot": "/evidence-attribution/review-readiness/adjudication-slots/EAR-OPS2-229-03-06.json",
      "review_questions": [
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-06-Q1",
          "category": "evidence-and-wording",
          "question": "Does the bounded statement for 'versioning' stop at the highest supported attribution rung and preserve claimant, status, confidence, reliability, and scope separately?",
          "preserved_statement": "Use visible review dates, supersession links, and preserved earlier dispositions rather than silent certainty edits.",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-06-Q2",
          "category": "source-and-translation",
          "question": "Which current primary, authoritative, locally authored, affected-community, or original-language source is required to confirm, qualify, contradict, or supersede this disposition?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        },
        {
          "question_id": "EAR-OPS2-229-03-06-Q3",
          "category": "rights-remedy-and-publication-effect",
          "question": "What privacy, rights, remedy, correction, and publication effect follows from the review, and what must remain blocked or redacted?",
          "response": null,
          "status": "unanswered"
        }
      ],
      "review_state": "unanswered"
    }
  ],
  "reviewer_owned_fields": {
    "reviewer_identity_or_consented_anonymity": null,
    "qualification_and_scope": null,
    "legal_qualification": null,
    "translation_qualification": null,
    "technical_attribution_qualification": null,
    "local_or_affected_community_relationship": null,
    "conflict_and_funding_disclosure": null,
    "review_completion": null
  },
  "publication_blockers": [
    "Independent qualified human review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review has not been supplied.",
    "Qualified human translation and original-language review have not been supplied where required.",
    "Locally informed and affected-community review have not been supplied.",
    "Technical attribution has not been independently validated for current factual reuse.",
    "No accountable editorial adjudication or publication approval has been documented."
  ],
  "durable_report": "/docs/report/evidence-attribution-review-readiness-osint-verification-and-attribution-under-uncertainty#review-readiness",
  "public_method": "/evidence-attribution/reviews",
  "non_scoring_boundary": "This packet contains questions and empty evidence fields, not a rating or ranking of any source, reviewer, community, person, organization, or jurisdiction.",
  "truth_boundary": "Structural readiness only. Reviewer-owned fields remain unanswered and no human, legal, local, technical, translation, editorial, or publication approval is implied."
}