{
  "$schema": "https://iarpg.com/oversight-remedy-capability-model.schema.json",
  "id": "https://iarpg.com/oversight-remedy-capability-model.json",
  "release": "IARPG-OPS-2",
  "version": "2.0.30-wip",
  "status": "reviewed-with-limitations",
  "truth_boundary": "A descriptive capability checklist, not a country ranking, legal opinion, legitimacy score, or proof of practical effectiveness.",
  "capabilities": [
    {
      "id": "ex-ante-authorization",
      "label": "Ex ante authorization",
      "question": "Can the body approve, reject, narrow, or condition activity before it begins?",
      "boundary": "Authorization is not ongoing inspection or individual remedy."
    },
    {
      "id": "records-and-system-access",
      "label": "Records and system access",
      "question": "Can the body obtain relevant files, systems, personnel, and classified material without discretionary withholding?",
      "boundary": "Formal access must be separated from delay, redaction, privilege disputes, and practical usability."
    },
    {
      "id": "compelled-cooperation",
      "label": "Compelled cooperation",
      "question": "Can the body require answers, production, testimony, preservation, or corrective action?",
      "boundary": "Request, recommendation, and legally enforceable compulsion are different."
    },
    {
      "id": "inspection-and-audit",
      "label": "Inspection and audit",
      "question": "Can the body inspect live or retrospective practice, sample cases, and test compliance?",
      "boundary": "Periodic thematic review is not the same as continuous operational inspection."
    },
    {
      "id": "complaint-intake",
      "label": "Complaint intake",
      "question": "Can an affected person submit a complaint through a legible and accessible route?",
      "boundary": "Standing, secrecy, jurisdiction, language, disability access, and notice may limit practical use."
    },
    {
      "id": "independent-adjudication",
      "label": "Independent adjudication",
      "question": "Can an independent court or tribunal determine legality and facts?",
      "boundary": "Administrative review, parliamentary scrutiny, and adjudication are not interchangeable."
    },
    {
      "id": "binding-remedy",
      "label": "Binding remedy",
      "question": "Can the body stop activity, quash authority, delete data, correct records, compensate harm, or require another enforceable remedy?",
      "boundary": "Criticism and recommendation do not equal binding remedy."
    },
    {
      "id": "public-reporting",
      "label": "Public reporting",
      "question": "Can the body publish findings, methods, aggregate data, dissent, and implementation status?",
      "boundary": "Publication may be delayed, redacted, filtered, or limited by neither-confirm-nor-deny rules."
    },
    {
      "id": "appeal-and-correction",
      "label": "Appeal and correction",
      "question": "Can decisions be appealed, errors corrected, and implementation followed over time?",
      "boundary": "A complaint outcome without appeal, implementation evidence, or correction history may not provide effective remedy."
    }
  ],
  "cross_cutting_fields": [
    "legal basis and scope",
    "institutional independence",
    "appointment and removal",
    "resources and expertise",
    "practical access",
    "timeliness",
    "binding effect",
    "complainant eligibility",
    "language and disability access",
    "secrecy and notification",
    "publication and redaction",
    "implementation follow-up",
    "appeal",
    "affected-community remedy"
  ],
  "comparison_rule": "Describe which body performs which capability, the practical limitations, and the remedy path. Do not add the capabilities into a score or rank jurisdictions."
}