Work in progress IARPG-OPS-2 2.0.32-wip

Global publication search

Search the operations design system

Type to search standards, missions, roles, authorities, reports, sources, pages, schemas, and UAI memory.

Multipolar fictional tasking

Every authority has objectives.
None owns moral truth.

Authorities are defined through customer, mandate, jurisdiction, priorities, resources, constraints, blind spots, institutional motivations, and consequences—not permanent hero or villain labels.

CIV-01Civil administration
Use in workbench →

Port Meridian Civic Continuity Office

Maintain essential services and provide decision warning about infrastructure disruption.

Customer
Metropolitan continuity council
Jurisdiction
Port Meridian civil systems and contracted utilities
Resource profile
Strong local records and infrastructure access; limited external reach.
Operational style
Procedural, evidence-heavy, and continuity focused.

Institutional motivations

  • Service continuity
  • Public confidence
  • Budget accountability
  • Avoidance of cascading infrastructure failure

Intelligence priorities

  • Supply interruption
  • Insider misuse
  • Foreign leverage over utilities
  • Disinformation affecting emergency response

Collection preferences

  • Auditable records
  • Liaison reporting
  • Technical monitoring
  • Public-source verification

Constraints and blind spots

  • Public-record obligations
  • Privacy rules
  • Local warrant thresholds
  • Limited covert authority
  • Blind spot: Slow cross-border access
  • Blind spot: Political pressure during service failures
Typical missionsPort-access anomaly investigationCritical-service sabotage review
Mandate conflictsCommercial confidentialityMilitary urgencyIndependent disclosure demands
MIL-07Military command
Use in workbench →

Meridian Joint Defense Assessment Cell

Provide warning, capability assessment, and force-protection intelligence for deployed formations.

Customer
Joint operations commander
Jurisdiction
Declared defense facilities, deployed units, and alliance tasking areas
Resource profile
Strong technical collection and transport; narrow customer deadlines.
Operational style
Time-sensitive, compartmented, and risk tolerant.

Institutional motivations

  • Force protection
  • Operational tempo
  • Alliance assurance
  • Prevention of strategic surprise

Intelligence priorities

  • Order of battle
  • Logistics vulnerability
  • Command intent
  • Technical capability

Collection preferences

  • Technical collection
  • Imagery
  • Liaison reporting
  • Field reconnaissance

Constraints and blind spots

  • Rules of engagement
  • Classification
  • Partner releasability
  • Command timelines
  • Blind spot: Civilian political effects
  • Blind spot: Commercial incentives outside the battlespace
Typical missionsCross-border ceasefire verificationDeployed-network compromise review
Mandate conflictsCivil due processScientific opennessCommercial continuity
COM-12Commercial intelligence service
Use in workbench →

Halcyon Commercial Intelligence Office

Protect research provenance, market access, personnel, and supply-chain continuity.

Customer
Board risk committee and operating divisions
Jurisdiction
Corporate facilities, contracts, and partner-access agreements
Resource profile
Strong financial and corporate access; contested legitimacy outside owned systems.
Operational style
Discreet, metrics driven, and access oriented.

Institutional motivations

  • Revenue continuity
  • Intellectual-property protection
  • Investor confidence
  • Contract performance

Intelligence priorities

  • Research theft
  • Supplier coercion
  • Regulatory exposure
  • Competitor capability

Collection preferences

  • Contract records
  • Source networks
  • Market analysis
  • Technical audit

Constraints and blind spots

  • Contract scope
  • Civil law
  • Brand risk
  • Shareholder oversight
  • Blind spot: Public-interest harms not tied to enterprise risk
  • Blind spot: Overconfidence in proprietary records
Typical missionsCorporate research-provenance disputeSupply-chain manipulation review
Mandate conflictsPublic disclosureState secrecyIndependent-source protection
INT-03International verification body
Use in workbench →

Armistice Verification Secretariat

Verify compliance claims and provide shared findings acceptable to multiple signatories.

Customer
Multilateral ceasefire commission
Jurisdiction
Inspection corridors, monitoring sites, and agreed data exchanges
Resource profile
High legitimacy and evidence discipline; limited coercive reach.
Operational style
Transparent, corroborative, and procedurally neutral.

Institutional motivations

  • Prevent escalation
  • Maintain shared facts
  • Protect inspector access
  • Preserve signatory confidence

Intelligence priorities

  • Ceasefire violations
  • Sensor manipulation
  • Restricted movement
  • False attribution

Collection preferences

  • Multi-party observation
  • Chain-of-custody evidence
  • Technical monitoring
  • Dissent preservation

Constraints and blind spots

  • Consent of signatories
  • Releasability
  • Neutral presentation
  • Limited enforcement authority
  • Blind spot: Covert action beyond inspection mandate
  • Blind spot: Deliberate delays by sponsors
Typical missionsCross-border ceasefire verificationInspection-route interference review
Mandate conflictsMilitary secrecyState deniabilityCommercial confidentiality
SCI-22Scientific or infrastructure consortium
Use in workbench →

Orison Infrastructure Research Consortium

Protect research integrity and assess technical anomalies affecting shared systems.

Customer
Member laboratories and infrastructure operators
Jurisdiction
Member laboratories, test ranges, and shared datasets
Resource profile
Deep technical expertise; limited field and coercive capability.
Operational style
Methodical, hypothesis driven, and review heavy.

Institutional motivations

  • Scientific continuity
  • Safety
  • Reproducibility
  • Protection of collaborative access

Intelligence priorities

  • Data provenance
  • Sabotage
  • Model contamination
  • Unauthorized transfer

Collection preferences

  • Technical audit
  • Experiment logs
  • Peer review
  • Specialist interviews

Constraints and blind spots

  • Research ethics
  • Data-sharing agreements
  • Safety certification
  • Institutional politics
  • Blind spot: Human-source manipulation
  • Blind spot: Political use of findings
Typical missionsCorporate research-provenance disputeSensor-array anomaly investigation
Mandate conflictsCustomer deadlinesClassificationCommercial exclusivity
IND-09Independent investigative network
Use in workbench →

Independent Source Protection Network

Preserve source safety, authenticate disclosures, and deliver findings without exposing unnecessary identities.

Customer
Protected sources and contracted public-interest investigators
Jurisdiction
Contractual safe channels and negotiated operating spaces
Resource profile
Flexible human networks and public research; limited protection and logistics.
Operational style
Distributed, cautious, and source centered.

Institutional motivations

  • Source survival
  • Investigative autonomy
  • Credible disclosure
  • Resistance to institutional capture

Intelligence priorities

  • Retaliation indicators
  • Document authenticity
  • Surveillance pressure
  • Disinformation against sources

Collection preferences

  • Human-source handling
  • Open-source corroboration
  • Document forensics
  • Distributed observation

Constraints and blind spots

  • Limited funds
  • No sovereign immunity
  • Reliance on reputation
  • High source-protection burden
  • Blind spot: Limited technical infrastructure
  • Blind spot: Dependence on volunteer networks
Typical missionsProtected-source extractionInternal leak and counterintelligence review
Mandate conflictsState secrecyCorporate injunctionsMilitary operational security

Authority is not oversight

Who can authorize,
inspect, hear, and remedy?

A complete authority profile should name the separate bodies or procedures that can approve activity, obtain records, compel cooperation, inspect practice, receive complaints, adjudicate legality, issue binding remedy, report publicly, and hear appeal. One fictional institution need not perform every function.

AUTHORIZE

Before activity begins

Approval, rejection, narrowing, conditions, and expiry belong to an explicit mandate.

INSPECT

During and after activity

Access to records, systems, personnel, and classified material must be separated from merely requesting cooperation.

COMPLAIN

A legible route for affected people

Standing, notice, secrecy, language, disability access, timeliness, and privacy determine practical usability.

REMEDY

An enforceable outcome

Stopping activity, correcting records, deleting data, compensating harm, publishing findings, and appeal remain distinct.

Connected tools and standards

Explore the wider AI ecosystem.