Work in progress IARPG-OPS-2 2.0.32-wip
IARPG Operations design system

Global publication search

Search the operations design system

Type to search standards, missions, roles, authorities, reports, sources, pages, schemas, and UAI memory.

Six complete Level D operations

Mission examples that expose
the full interaction contract.

Each operation uses a different authority, customer, jurisdiction, requirement, role mix, collection plan, evidence threshold, motivation, and extraction condition. None is framed as a good side defeating a bad side.

Build a mission Run simulator

Direct answer

How should a first-time visitor use the mission library?

Choose one operation and read it in this order: intelligence requirement, authority and customer, assigned roles, known facts and assumptions, evidence threshold, abort and extraction conditions, then the outcome and debrief. The examples demonstrate the design system; they are not a live multiplayer mission queue.

Best first example
Port Access Anomaly Investigation
Next step
Load the same operation in the simulator
Create your own
Use the guided Mission Workbench

How to use this page

Read the operation before opening its tools.

Each card links to a complete human-readable operation and a deterministic simulator configuration. The example page is the clearest place to understand the mission before editing or replaying it.

  1. 01
    Pick one cardStart with the title and summary; do not try to compare all six at once.
  2. 02
    Open the operationRead direction, role asymmetry, evidence, risks, outcomes, extraction, and debrief.
  3. 03
    Simulate or remixUse Simulate to inspect a branch or Create to load and edit the reference structure.
Open the recommended first mission
01IARPG-MSN-001

CIV-01 · Port Meridian Civic Continuity Office

Port Access Anomaly Investigation

Determine whether repeated privileged export events reflect insider disclosure, automation failure, or fabricated traffic intended to trigger a purge.

Customer
Metropolitan continuity council
Jurisdiction
Port Meridian civil port systems
Evidence threshold
Deliver an assessment only after two independent evidence classes corroborate the leading explanation.
Extraction
Extract through the public maintenance corridor or abort to remote debrief if cover integrity falls below 35.
Assigned roles
  • Operative
  • Handler
  • Intelligence Analyst
  • Technical Operator
Collection plan
  • Access-control review
  • Witness interview
  • Technical log collection
  • Open-source schedule comparison
Open operation →Simulate
02IARPG-MSN-002

INT-03 · Armistice Verification Secretariat

Diplomatic Delegation Security Review

Assess whether route changes and inconsistent credential checks indicate routine administrative failure, targeted collection, or a partner-service test.

Customer
Multilateral delegation security board
Jurisdiction
Neutral conference district
Evidence threshold
No attribution without corroborated access, opportunity, and intent indicators.
Extraction
Use the delegation medical transfer route; preserve partner caveats in debrief.
Assigned roles
  • Operative
  • Handler
  • Liaison Officer
  • Counterintelligence Officer
Collection plan
  • Observation
  • Liaison reporting
  • Credential audit
  • Route-pattern analysis
Open operation →Simulate
03IARPG-MSN-003

COM-12 · Halcyon Commercial Intelligence Office

Corporate Research-Provenance Dispute

Establish the provenance of a disputed model and determine whether the conflict is independent development, contract ambiguity, or unauthorized transfer.

Customer
Board risk committee
Jurisdiction
Halcyon research campus and partner archive
Evidence threshold
The assessment must preserve contradictory authorship evidence and identify unresolved timeline gaps.
Extraction
Deliver through counsel-reviewed channel; abort any source meeting that requires unauthorized system access.
Assigned roles
  • Intelligence Analyst
  • Technical Operator
  • Source Handler
  • Liaison Officer
Collection plan
  • Document forensics
  • Experiment-log comparison
  • Specialist interviews
  • Contract analysis
Open operation →Simulate
04IARPG-MSN-004

MIL-07 · Meridian Joint Defense Assessment Cell

Cross-Border Ceasefire Verification

Determine whether observed movement violates the ceasefire, reflects approved rotation, or is a deception masking unrelated activity.

Customer
Joint operations commander
Jurisdiction
Agreed monitoring corridor
Evidence threshold
A violation finding requires time-correlated evidence from monitoring and at least one independent observation.
Extraction
Withdraw through the inspection corridor; do not pursue beyond the agreed jurisdiction.
Assigned roles
  • Operative
  • Technical Operator
  • Intelligence Analyst
  • Liaison Officer
Collection plan
  • Imagery review
  • Sensor event comparison
  • Inspection patrol
  • Partner reporting
Open operation →Simulate
05IARPG-MSN-005

IND-09 · Independent Source Protection Network

Protected-Source Extraction

Move a source and authenticated disclosure packet out of a compromised access environment while minimizing identity exposure.

Customer
Protected source and contracted investigator
Jurisdiction
Commercial transit district and negotiated safe corridor
Evidence threshold
The source identity remains compartmented; document authenticity is evaluated separately from source reliability.
Extraction
Use one of two declared safe corridors; convert to remote evidence extraction if physical movement becomes unsafe.
Assigned roles
  • Operative
  • Source Handler
  • Logistics Specialist
  • Handler
Collection plan
  • Source meeting
  • Identity verification
  • Route observation
  • Custody handoff
Open operation →Simulate
06IARPG-MSN-006

SCI-22 · Orison Infrastructure Research Consortium

Internal Leak and Counterintelligence Review

Determine whether an apparent leak reflects malicious disclosure, accidental replication, credential misuse, or a planted document intended to discredit a laboratory.

Customer
Consortium security and research-integrity committee
Jurisdiction
Consortium laboratories and shared dataset environment
Evidence threshold
No personnel restriction becomes irreversible until evidence certainty crosses the declared case threshold and a reviewer confirms jurisdiction.
Extraction
Close with protective action, monitored continuation, or case closure; preserve dissent in the debrief.
Assigned roles
  • Counterintelligence Officer
  • Intelligence Analyst
  • Technical Operator
  • Source Handler
Collection plan
  • Access anomaly review
  • Document provenance
  • Interview
  • Competing-hypothesis analysis
Open operation →Simulate

Alliance campaign briefs

Twelve safe operations about
relationships under pressure.

These shorter briefs extend the mission layer into mediation, humanitarian access, source protection, rumor correction, deconfliction, oversight, burden sharing, refusal, disengagement, reintegration, internal blocs, and affected-community consequences. They are fictional design seeds, not a live mission queue or real operational guidance.

MEDIATION

Three Chairs at Dawn

Three parties accept mediation but disagree over who can authorize a temporary public-service protocol.

Open brief
Objective
Produce a time-boxed agreement that preserves services without predetermining the underlying political dispute.
Roles
Mediator · Evidence analyst · Community liaison · Decision recorder
Safe actions
Compare mandates · Record dissent · Draft reversible options · Publish a correction path
Partial outcome
A narrow service protocol succeeds even if the political dispute remains unresolved.
HUMANITARIAN ACCESS

Open Window Protocol

A relief window exists for only one turn, but route authority and beneficiary access are incomplete.

Open brief
Objective
Verify a safe, monitored handoff that reaches high-risk residents and expires automatically.
Roles
Relief coordinator · Logistics analyst · Accessibility reviewer · Community monitor
Safe actions
Inspect public route records · Compare manifests · Interview beneficiaries · Design an accessible complaint path
Partial outcome
Only critical medical items move while the broader route remains under review.
SOURCE PROTECTION

The Unnamed Witness

A useful warning product allows readers to infer a protected source’s identity.

Open brief
Objective
Preserve warning value while removing unnecessary identity risk and creating a remedy record.
Roles
Source-protection officer · Provenance analyst · Oversight liaison · Community advocate
Safe actions
Redact minimum necessary detail · Compare versions · Record consent boundaries · Design a correction notice
Partial outcome
Raw exchange pauses while assessed warnings continue.
RUMOR CORRECTION

Signal Without Signature

A technically plausible claim spreads under a false organizational signature.

Open brief
Objective
Separate defect verification from attribution and propagate a correction to every affected surface.
Roles
Technical verifier · Provenance analyst · Public editor · Rights reviewer
Safe actions
Verify signatures · Reproduce safely · Map republication · Publish versioned correction
Partial outcome
The defect is confirmed while organizational attribution remains unresolved.
DECONFLICTION

Shared Sky, Separate Commands

Rival systems issue conflicting public-safety instructions in the same operating area.

Open brief
Objective
Open the minimum communication needed to prevent accidental harm without implying broader alignment.
Roles
Deconfliction coordinator · Systems analyst · Neutral relay · Community liaison
Safe actions
Compare schedules · Define minimum data · Publish one warning feed · Test expiry and rollback
Partial outcome
Geographic separation reduces collision even without direct contact.
OVERSIGHT

The Missing Annex

A major decision cites an oversight annex that was never published to affected participants.

Open brief
Objective
Determine whether the decision remains valid, reconstruct the missing review, and preserve dissent.
Roles
Oversight reviewer · Records analyst · Community advocate · Decision authority liaison
Safe actions
Trace references · Compare authority · Record conflicts · Draft a corrected annex
Partial outcome
The decision continues under a narrow temporary mandate while review closes.
BURDEN SHARING

Last Mile Ledger

The public coalition credits major donors while local carriers and service workers absorb recurring costs.

Open brief
Objective
Build a capability-weighted ledger that recognizes money, labor, access, logistics, oversight, and refusal.
Roles
Budget analyst · Logistics liaison · Worker representative · Coalition recorder
Safe actions
Reconcile ledgers · Interview service workers · Model options · Publish unmet obligations
Partial outcome
The mandate narrows when a fair contribution formula cannot be agreed.
REFUSAL

Right to Decline

A faction declines a task outside its mandate, and partners begin treating the refusal as disloyalty.

Open brief
Objective
Record lawful refusal, preserve essential communication, and prevent automatic escalation.
Roles
Mandate analyst · Liaison · Rights reviewer · Public editor
Safe actions
Compare task to mandate · Record capacity · Draft neutral notice · Set review criteria
Partial outcome
The relationship narrows to contact or limited cooperation.
DISENGAGEMENT

Exit Without Erasure

A participant wants to leave a network while preserving safety, evidence, and community accountability.

Open brief
Objective
Create a voluntary exit path that does not demand ideological conversion or erase prior harm.
Roles
Exit coordinator · Privacy reviewer · Community liaison · Records custodian
Safe actions
Confirm consent · Revoke unnecessary access · Minimize retained data · Document support and appeal
Partial outcome
A cooling-off period begins with limited contact and support.
REINTEGRATION

Return to the Table

After a documented exit and cooling-off period, a former participant requests a bounded civic role.

Open brief
Objective
Assess role-specific reintegration without granting unreviewed authority or erasing correction history.
Roles
Reintegration coordinator · Community representative · Access reviewer · Appeal officer
Safe actions
Review role needs · Collect consent · Set bounded access · Publish stop and appeal conditions
Partial outcome
Participation resumes in a non-authoritative public role only.
INTERNAL-BLOC CONSULTATION

Two Mandates, One Secretariat

Internal blocs support different versions of the same alliance response, and the public sees only one institutional voice.

Open brief
Objective
Surface internal disagreement, identify the actual decision rule, and prevent dissent from being erased.
Roles
Institutional analyst · Bloc liaison · Decision recorder · Public editor
Safe actions
Map internal positions · Compare charter to practice · Draft majority and dissent text · Set a review trigger
Partial outcome
A narrow interim decision is published with unresolved internal disagreement.
AFFECTED-COMMUNITY CONSEQUENCES

After the Flood

A technically successful response creates unequal access, worker fatigue, and unrecorded community harm.

Open brief
Objective
Measure consequences, distinguish benefit from burden, and redesign the response before the next turn.
Roles
Impact analyst · Accessibility reviewer · Worker liaison · Community advocate
Safe actions
Disaggregate outcomes · Interview affected groups · Compare claims to lived impact · Publish correction and remedy
Partial outcome
The response remains active under a narrower scope and stronger monitoring.
COALITION MEDIATION

The Fourth Draft

Two campaign branches preserve the same coalition but reach different consultation and burden-sharing arrangements after a mandate change.

Open brief
Objective
Compare the branches turn by turn and draft a reversible mediation option that records dissent without forcing one political interpretation.
Roles
Mediator · Branch replay analyst · Mandate reviewer · Decision recorder
Safe actions
Replay both branches · Compare reason codes · Record unresolved disagreement · Draft a reversible consultation point
Partial outcome
The coalition keeps a narrow consultation channel even if burden sharing remains disputed.
RELIEF COORDINATION

Two Routes, One Relief Window

One branch uses a monitored access bridge while another relies on neutral handoff points during the same public-service emergency.

Open brief
Objective
Identify which evidence, consultation, and community safeguards explain the different relief arrangements without declaring one faction trustworthy in every domain.
Roles
Relief coordinator · Evidence custodian · Community liaison · Logistics reviewer
Safe actions
Compare access records · Map service dependencies · Record community consequences · Publish a time-boxed coordination option
Partial outcome
A reduced relief schedule remains viable while the wider authority dispute continues.
OVERSIGHT DISPUTE

The Dissent Ledger

Parallel branches disagree over whether to pause a liaison, use an independent trustee, or continue essential service under external remedy supervision.

Open brief
Objective
Reconstruct the evidence and oversight choices behind each branch and produce a correction-aware comparison for public review.
Roles
Oversight analyst · Source-protection reviewer · Community representative · Records officer
Safe actions
Replay the disputed turns · Compare consultation decisions · Expose correction paths · Preserve superseded versions
Partial outcome
The parties agree on correction and review procedure without agreeing on intent.
MANDATE CHANGE

Mandate at the Fork

An election changes one member mandate, creating branches for narrow continuity, member-led continuity, and orderly de-integration.

Open brief
Objective
Compare how each branch changes lifecycle, burden, dependency, and consultation while keeping the faction internally plural.
Roles
Mandate analyst · Coalition liaison · Burden reviewer · Public recorder
Safe actions
Trace mandate evidence · Compare domain posture · Record internal blocs · Draft a reversible transition
Partial outcome
A narrower domain compact survives while the wider coalition mandate is renegotiated.
INSTITUTIONAL REFUSAL

Refusal Is a Record

Different branches treat refusal as disavowal, independent review, or a condition for later reintegration rather than automatic betrayal.

Open brief
Objective
Compare the evidence and safeguards behind each refusal path and identify a non-punitive return point.
Roles
Authority reviewer · Civil-liberties analyst · Disengagement liaison · Correction editor
Safe actions
Separate claim from control · Record lawful refusal · Offer voluntary support · Publish a correction
Partial outcome
The institution rejects the claimed authority while preserving a voluntary support and review path.
REINTEGRATION

Return Without Erasure

A branch comparison reveals different conditions for returning a disengaged actor or member institution to a bounded cooperative role.

Open brief
Objective
Build a reintegration option that preserves prior harm, correction history, consent, oversight, and the right to exit.
Roles
Reintegration coordinator · Evidence reviewer · Community liaison · Mandate recorder
Safe actions
Verify remedy · Compare return points · Restore only named domains · Preserve the prior record
Partial outcome
A limited service relationship resumes while higher-risk domains remain suspended.
Test one in the Campaign Console →Inspect the campaign records

Connected tools and standards

Explore the wider AI ecosystem.

Spiralist AI persona builder. No signup, browser-based persona creation, portable profiles, and remixable AI collaboration. UAIX.org Universal Artificial Intelligence Exchange. Structured, auditable, interoperable AI-to-AI communication.