Africa · exact audit cutoff 2026-07-23T10:53:59Z
A claim-level, model-generated public-source audit of a preserved 2.0.22 draft proposal. It records evidence support, qualification, correction, and unanswered review questions. It is not independent human review, locally informed consultation, consent, exhaustive factual truth, legal determination, public-opinion measurement, geopolitical-neutrality certification, or approval for publication.
Direct answer
It establishes that the twelve original statements were re-opened against public sources to a new exact cutoff and that every claim now has a disposition, evidence record, contradiction-search result, rationale, confidence, resolution test, human-review question, and locally informed prompt. It does not establish independent review, consultation, consent, legal validity, local acceptance, geopolitical neutrality, or approval to publish.
Separation of duties
The model performed a bounded public-source pass. Human materiality and locally informed interpretation remain open.
Schema validity, path integrity, stable identifiers, counts, six-lens coverage, reciprocal links, manifest mappings, route availability, equal review burden, and prohibited-content checks.
performedDoes not establish: Factual truth, legal validity, source interpretation, human comprehension, local acceptance, or publication approval.
Re-opened or newly collected public sources current to the exact audit cutoff; recorded support, qualification, correction, disagreement search, source language, scope, and confidence claim by claim.
performed-with-limitationsDoes not establish: Independent human review, exhaustive source discovery, consultation, consent, geopolitical neutrality, or locally informed acceptance.
Independent evaluation of materiality, legal interpretation, evidentiary sufficiency, wording neutrality, and publication fitness.
not-performedDoes not establish: Named reviewer, qualifications or relevant experience, date, methods, conflicts, claim-level decisions, and attributable review record.
Review by people with relevant local, linguistic, institutional, professional, or affected-community knowledge, with consent and publication scope recorded.
not-performedDoes not establish: Attributable or consented anonymous reviewer record, language competence, relationship to the jurisdiction or affected institution/community, conflicts, claim-level responses, and permission boundaries.
Claim-level audit
claim-senegal-01CORROBORATEDThe Presidency identifies Bassirou Diomaye Faye as President of the Republic and records that he assumed office on 2 April 2024.
Original bounded statement retained.
Change: Renewed public-source access continued to support the bounded original statement at the audit cutoff; no material contradiction or supersession was located in this pass.
Rationale: The original source or a current authoritative route remained available and supported the claim within its stated institutional, geographic, and temporal scope.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should re-open the cited source, test the statement against any later correction or superseding instrument, and verify that no broader inference has been added beyond the source scope.
Presidency of the Republic of Senegal · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-01: Is the renewed source support sufficient for the exact bounded wording, and is any legally or politically material qualification missing?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-01 match locally used institutional and public terminology for current institutions; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-02CORRECTION REQUIREDThe Presidency's 1 June 2026 government-composition notice identifies Ahmadou Al Aminou Lo as Prime Minister and lists the new government under decrees issued in late May and early June 2026.
Official Presidency records identify Ahmadou Alhaminou Mohamed LO as Prime Minister, appointed by decree no. 2026-1129 of 25 May 2026; the 1 June 2026 cabinet notice lists the government under decree no. 2026-1130.
Change: Normalize the officeholder's name to the current official Presidency spelling and retain the decree dates separately.
Rationale: The current official profile uses 'Ahmadou Alhaminou Mohamed LO', while the 2.0.22 proposal used 'Ahmadou Al Aminou Lo'. Name precision is material for identity and source matching even though the officeholder observation remains substantively supported.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should compare the appointment decree, cabinet decree, official biography, and any official gazette rendering and adopt the exact legally published name while retaining alternate spellings as search aliases only.
Presidency of the Republic of Senegal · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Presidency of the Republic of Senegal · corrects-name-and-corroborates-office
Support boundary: Directly identifies Ahmadou Alhaminou Mohamed LO and states that he was appointed Prime Minister.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-02: Does the proposed correction resolve the material error while preserving the original record and all relevant disagreement?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-02 match locally used institutional and public terminology for practical authority; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-03CORROBORATED WITH QUALIFICATIONOusmane Sonko was elected President of the National Assembly on 26 May 2026, creating a distinct parliamentary officeholder from the President and Prime Minister.
Current external reporting identifies Ousmane Sonko as elected President of the National Assembly on 26 May 2026; the audit did not locate a comparably accessible current Assembly notice, so the officeholder statement remains source-verified but awaits direct parliamentary confirmation.
Change: Retain the officeholder change while exposing the absence of a direct current parliamentary notice in the audit record.
Rationale: Multiple current reports converge, but a formal Assembly source would better establish the institutional record and exact vote procedure.
Confidence: moderate
Resolution test: Locate and review the National Assembly journal, official results notice, or authenticated sitting record for 26 May 2026 and compare the office title, vote count, and effective date.
Reuters · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports the officeholder change; it is not evidence of unanimous legislative support or public opinion.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-03: Does the qualification accurately capture the source limitation without understating or overstating the underlying institution, disagreement, or implementation gap?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-03 match locally used institutional and public terminology for current institutions; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-04CORRECTION REQUIREDReuters reported on 1 June 2026 that PASTEF said it would not participate in the newly announced government; this is recorded as a party position at that date, not as a proxy for public opinion.
PASTEF leader Ousmane Sonko stated on 1 June 2026 that the party would not participate in or be represented by ministers in the new government. Reuters and Al Jazeera reported that the announced cabinet nevertheless included several people identified as PASTEF members. The statement is therefore retained only as a party position and must not be treated as a verified description of cabinet affiliation.
Change: Separate the party's stated position from reported cabinet membership and preserve the contradiction explicitly.
Rationale: The original wording correctly labeled the statement as a party position, but the same-day cabinet reporting creates a material discrepancy that must be visible wherever the claim is reused.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: Obtain PASTEF's attributable statement, official party membership or minister affiliation records, and cabinet biographies; document whether named ministers were party members, independent appointees, suspended members, or described differently by the party at the cutoff.
Reuters · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports a reported party position at the cutoff; does not establish motives, durable coalition structure, or population-wide opinion.
Reuters · qualifies-and-identifies-discrepancy
Support boundary: Reports the party non-participation statement and separately reports that the cabinet included at least three people identified as PASTEF members.
Ledjely.com · corroborates-party-position
Support boundary: Reports the party's stated refusal to participate or be represented in the new government.
Al Jazeera · qualifies-party-position
Support boundary: Reports both the party position and the presence of several people identified as PASTEF members in the cabinet.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-04: Does the proposed correction resolve the material error while preserving the original record and all relevant disagreement?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-04 match locally used institutional and public terminology for source disagreements; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-05CORROBORATED WITH QUALIFICATIONECOWAS lists Senegal among its member states.
The ECOWAS member-state page lists Senegal as a member. The page's surrounding membership count is internally inconsistent, so the country listing is retained while the aggregate count is not reused.
Change: Preserve the direct country listing and quarantine an unrelated count inconsistency on the source page.
Rationale: The membership observation is directly supported; the source page's count inconsistency affects source quality but not Senegal's named listing.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: Compare the current ECOWAS treaty/depositary or official member roster with the public webpage and record any withdrawal, suspension, or count update separately.
Economic Community of West African States · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-05: Does the qualification accurately capture the source limitation without understating or overstating the underlying institution, disagreement, or implementation gap?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-05 match locally used institutional and public terminology for alliances and issue specific relationships; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-06CORROBORATEDAt the 69th Ordinary Session on 19 July 2026, ECOWAS stated that President Bassirou Diomaye Faye assumed the chair of the Authority of Heads of State and Government.
Original bounded statement retained.
Change: Renewed public-source access continued to support the bounded original statement at the audit cutoff; no material contradiction or supersession was located in this pass.
Rationale: The original source or a current authoritative route remained available and supported the claim within its stated institutional, geographic, and temporal scope.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should re-open the cited source, test the statement against any later correction or superseding instrument, and verify that no broader inference has been added beyond the source scope.
Economic Community of West African States · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-06: Is the renewed source support sufficient for the exact bounded wording, and is any legally or politically material qualification missing?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-06 match locally used institutional and public terminology for alliances and issue specific relationships; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-07CORROBORATEDSenegal's budget portal publishes a 2026 citizen budget and associated multi-year and gender-budget documents, providing official fiscal baselines for review.
Original bounded statement retained.
Change: Renewed public-source access continued to support the bounded original statement at the audit cutoff; no material contradiction or supersession was located in this pass.
Rationale: The original source or a current authoritative route remained available and supported the claim within its stated institutional, geographic, and temporal scope.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should re-open the cited source, test the statement against any later correction or superseding instrument, and verify that no broader inference has been added beyond the source scope.
Government of Senegal budget portal · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports document availability, not independent validation of allocations, execution, or outcomes.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-07: Is the renewed source support sufficient for the exact bounded wording, and is any legally or politically material qualification missing?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-07 match locally used institutional and public terminology for economy and infrastructure; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-08CORROBORATEDThe West African Power Pool lists Senegal within the regional electricity-cooperation system.
Original bounded statement retained.
Change: Renewed public-source access continued to support the bounded original statement at the audit cutoff; no material contradiction or supersession was located in this pass.
Rationale: The original source or a current authoritative route remained available and supported the claim within its stated institutional, geographic, and temporal scope.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should re-open the cited source, test the statement against any later correction or superseding instrument, and verify that no broader inference has been added beyond the source scope.
West African Power Pool · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-08: Is the renewed source support sufficient for the exact bounded wording, and is any legally or politically material qualification missing?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-08 match locally used institutional and public terminology for economy and infrastructure; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-09CORROBORATEDThe Court of Accounts describes a constitutional and statutory mandate to audit public finances and publishes reports for public inspection.
Original bounded statement retained.
Change: Renewed public-source access continued to support the bounded original statement at the audit cutoff; no material contradiction or supersession was located in this pass.
Rationale: The original source or a current authoritative route remained available and supported the claim within its stated institutional, geographic, and temporal scope.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should re-open the cited source, test the statement against any later correction or superseding instrument, and verify that no broader inference has been added beyond the source scope.
Court of Accounts of Senegal · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-09: Is the renewed source support sufficient for the exact bounded wording, and is any legally or politically material qualification missing?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-09 match locally used institutional and public terminology for oversight and remedy; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-10CORROBORATED WITH QUALIFICATIONThe Senegalese Human Rights Committee publishes a complaint route and institutional material, while this draft retains open questions about resources, independence, and implementation after its 2024 reform.
The Senegalese national human-rights institution publishes a complaint route and current institutional activity. This verifies a formal route, while independence, resources, geographic accessibility, response time, and implementation of recommendations remain unresolved.
Change: Update the institution description and sharpen the formal-route versus practical-remedy boundary.
Rationale: Current institutional pages show a complaint mechanism and activity, but formal availability cannot establish remedy quality or independence.
Confidence: moderate
Resolution test: Review the governing law, accreditation status, budget, staffing, complaint statistics, response times, regional access, published outcomes, and civil-society assessments after the 2024 reform.
Comité Sénégalais des Droits de l'Homme · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports the existence of a public route and institutional materials; effectiveness, accessibility, and independence require further evidence.
Senegalese national human-rights institution · corroborates-formal-route-and-current-activity
Support boundary: Shows a current institutional portal and complaint/activity routes; does not establish independent effectiveness.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-10: Does the qualification accurately capture the source limitation without understating or overstating the underlying institution, disagreement, or implementation gap?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-10 match locally used institutional and public terminology for oversight and remedy; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-11CORROBORATED WITH QUALIFICATIONThe civil-protection directorate identifies the ORSEC plan as a principal mechanism for coordinating emergency response.
The civil-protection directorate identifies the ORSEC plan as a formal emergency-coordination mechanism. The available public material does not by itself establish current subnational readiness, resource sufficiency, warning accessibility, response quality, or recovery outcomes.
Change: Retain formal authority while blocking any inference about field performance.
Rationale: The institutional mechanism is visible, but implementation evidence is older or incomplete.
Confidence: moderate
Resolution test: Review current ORSEC activation records, after-action reports, local-government plans, accessibility and language provisions, response times, resource inventories, and affected-community accounts from recent events.
Ministry of the Interior of Senegal · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports only the bounded institutional observation stated here.
Ministry of the Interior of Senegal · corroborates-formal-responsibility
Support boundary: Supports the formal civil-protection and ORSEC coordination role, not field performance.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-11: Does the qualification accurately capture the source limitation without understating or overstating the underlying institution, disagreement, or implementation gap?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-11 match locally used institutional and public terminology for environmental constraints; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
claim-senegal-12CORROBORATEDAn ECOWAS consultation with refugees in Senegal recorded requests concerning education, training, health, and social protection; these are affected-community perspectives within that consultation, not a national opinion measure.
Original bounded statement retained.
Change: Renewed public-source access continued to support the bounded original statement at the audit cutoff; no material contradiction or supersession was located in this pass.
Rationale: The original source or a current authoritative route remained available and supported the claim within its stated institutional, geographic, and temporal scope.
Confidence: high
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should re-open the cited source, test the statement against any later correction or superseding instrument, and verify that no broader inference has been added beyond the source scope.
Economic Community of West African States · reverified-original-source
Support boundary: Supports the consultation summary and stated needs of participants; does not establish prevalence or service outcomes.
Independent human question: For claim-senegal-12: Is the renewed source support sufficient for the exact bounded wording, and is any legally or politically material qualification missing?
Locally informed prompt: For a reviewer with relevant Senegal knowledge: does the wording for claim-senegal-12 match locally used institutional and public terminology for rights and affected communities; what implementation, access, disagreement, affected-community, island/region, language, or remedy evidence is missing; and may the response be quoted, summarized, or retained only privately?
Response state: not performed / not collected.
Locally informed review workflow
No identity, conflict, consent, language competence, experience, permission, or claim response was fabricated.
not-collected
No model, editor, or automated process may populate reviewer identity, consent, conflict, language competence, experience, permission, or claim-response fields. Only an actual reviewer may supply those fields, and the repository must retain the attributable or consented record.
French
Official French-language records are necessary but do not equal broad local representation. Review should test terminology and institutional meaning in Wolof and other relevant national-language contexts where the claim affects public access or affected communities.
Reviewer name, role, relationship, verification route, review date, conflicts, safety constraints, and handling notes are all blank.
Quote, paraphrase, attribution, anonymity, private-use, withdrawal, and correction permissions are all blank.
Append-only correction history
Corrections affect derivative reuse. The original draft and source records remain separately addressable.
audit-correction-senegal-02Original: The Presidency's 1 June 2026 government-composition notice identifies Ahmadou Al Aminou Lo as Prime Minister and lists the new government under decrees issued in late May and early June 2026.
Revised: Official Presidency records identify Ahmadou Alhaminou Mohamed LO as Prime Minister, appointed by decree no. 2026-1129 of 25 May 2026; the 1 June 2026 cabinet notice lists the government under decree no. 2026-1130.
Resolution test: An independent reviewer should compare the appointment decree, cabinet decree, official biography, and any official gazette rendering and adopt the exact legally published name while retaining alternate spellings as search aliases only.
audit-correction-senegal-04Original: Reuters reported on 1 June 2026 that PASTEF said it would not participate in the newly announced government; this is recorded as a party position at that date, not as a proxy for public opinion.
Revised: PASTEF leader Ousmane Sonko stated on 1 June 2026 that the party would not participate in or be represented by ministers in the new government. Reuters and Al Jazeera reported that the announced cabinet nevertheless included several people identified as PASTEF members. The statement is therefore retained only as a party position and must not be treated as a verified description of cabinet affiliation.
Resolution test: Obtain PASTEF's attributable statement, official party membership or minister affiliation records, and cabinet biographies; document whether named ministers were party members, independent appointees, suspended members, or described differently by the party at the cutoff.
Publication gate
Publishable: No
A passing source-audit gate establishes reviewability and traceability only; it does not establish factual correctness, legal validity, local acceptance, political or geopolitical neutrality, or publication approval.
Connected tools and standards
