IARPG-OPS-1 online Intelligence operations standard Fictional missions · neutral authorities
AI-02 Current Synthetic Sources Version 1.0.0

Mission Claim Verification

Potentially unreliable tasking is checked against records, world state, source history, logic, location, and mission economics before acceptance.

Normative requirements

What conforming mission design must express.

01
MUST required for conformance

Provide at least one accessible method to test high-impact mission claims before commitment.

02
MUST required for conformance

Distinguish object, relation, event, location, authority, and reward claims in the verification model.

03
SHOULD recommended unless a documented reason applies

Use reliability history, contradiction checks, coordinate checks, source comparison, and authority confirmation as complementary tools.

04
SHOULD recommended unless a documented reason applies

False or misleading tasking still produce some recoverable intelligence, discovery, or progression value when pursued in good faith.

05
MAY optional supported behavior

Player skills prioritize anomalies but never output infallible truth labels.

Mission lifecycle fit

Where this record applies.

Task Plan Validate

This list identifies the mission stages where the record is most likely to be implemented or reviewed. It does not prevent the requirement from influencing adjacent phases.

Search and implementation terms

Vocabulary carried by this record.

Supporting research

Deep links into the complete report archive.

The canonical record stays concise. These links preserve the longer argument, design context, limitations, and source lineage in the `/docs/` archive.

Connected tools and standards

Explore the wider AI ecosystem.