IARPG-OPS-1 online Intelligence operations standard Fictional missions · neutral authorities
SAFE-01 Current Governance & Safety Version 1.0.0

Safety and Fiction Boundary

Public material stays fictional, game-system focused, and clearly separated from real-world medical, legal, investigative, or tactical authority.

Normative requirements

What conforming mission design must express.

01
MUST required for conformance

Label organizations, authorities, operations, jurisdictions, and examples as fictional where ambiguity could cause harm.

02
MUST required for conformance

Keep psychiatric status separate from guilt, danger, credibility, alignment, and punishment mechanics.

03
MUST required for conformance

Do not investigate, validate, or amplify a visitor's real-world espionage or surveillance claims.

04
MUST required for conformance

Keep public tradecraft documentation abstract and game-oriented rather than practically actionable for real-world wrongdoing.

05
SHOULD recommended unless a documented reason applies

Link real-world grounding and urgent-help information to the separate EspionagePsychosis.com resource.

06
MAY optional supported behavior

Use content warnings and accessibility controls for distressing fictional scenarios.

Mission lifecycle fit

Where this record applies.

Task Debrief

This list identifies the mission stages where the record is most likely to be implemented or reviewed. It does not prevent the requirement from influencing adjacent phases.

Search and implementation terms

Vocabulary carried by this record.

Supporting research

Deep links into the complete report archive.

The canonical record stays concise. These links preserve the longer argument, design context, limitations, and source lineage in the `/docs/` archive.

Connected tools and standards

Explore the wider AI ecosystem.