Status
Current comparative-fairness record for IARPG-OPS-2 2.0.30-wip. Equal structural burden is implemented across twelve sources and seventy-two dispositions. No human review, translation approval, local acceptance, adjudication, or publication approval is claimed.
Purpose
Demonstrate comparable review burden without ranking sources, authors, organizations, communities, movements, countries, or reviewers.
Findings
- Each source receives eight source-level categories and each disposition receives three claim-level prompts and one adjudication slot.
- Reviewer-owned and adjudicator-owned fields answered: 0.
- Completed adjudications: 0.
- Current factual claims approved through this pass: 0.
- Qualified translation or locally informed approvals: 0.
- Structural equality does not erase different legal systems, languages, affected communities, source availability, or technical complexity.
- Any later difference in review burden or wording must be tied to documented evidence needs, not comparative importance, threat, virtue, legitimacy, credibility, loyalty, morality, or geopolitical priority.
Asymmetry Review
The fairness pass checks question count, category coverage, null-field treatment, privacy, rights, remedy, local-source requirements, translation requirements, wording intensity, and publication blockers. It does not force identical answers or pretend that all sources have equal public records. Transparent systems may expose more disputes, and low-resource language environments may require more translation effort; neither difference is a score.
Unresolved Approval
All twelve packets remain awaiting qualified human review. Every disposition remains publication-blocked until applicable current-fact, legal, translation, technical, local, affected-community, privacy, rights, remedy, and adjudication evidence is supplied and reviewed.
Memory References
Related Durable Documents
- [Review-readiness protocol](evidence-attribution-human-review-readiness-and-translation-quality-protocol.md#findings)
- [2.0.29 integration findings](evidence-attribution-oversight-and-leaderless-network-research-integration-report.md#findings)
- [International institutional fairness](equal-standards-across-unequal-records-international-institutional-fairness-rights-and-evidence-audit.md#mandatory-analytical-distinctions-and-rights-safeguards)
Supersession Status
Current comparative record. Later human findings must append evidence and preserve this zero-submission baseline.
